Ask An Expert

One trick to try in cases like this would be to seem the father in the censuses, or even his father's death. You could also seem your George after his 1864 marriage - in the 1871 and later censuses. That would give you his place of birth, and you could look for Bobbetts in the earlier censuses for that place who should, logically, include your correct George.

It's still not quite there, but it remains intriguing. Is the real problem that you think Price was not the original family name? Or do you mean Kirby (you give both names as his surname, above). It's pretty unlikely that a soldier could get away with such a subterfuge whilst serving in the Crimea - but I suppose he could have tried such a trick once he got back and was de-mobbed. If so, and you think David Price (or David Kirby) was an assumed name, then by looking in the army deaths you should find such a man dying in the Crimea. Finding his original identity would be harder, but if you have a male-line descendant of his you could have a Y chromosome DNA test and see if that person matched any other men who had been tested: their surname would probably be the same as "David's" original one.

There are two possible solutions - widen your search considerably, as she may have died anywhere in Britain, or even abroad, on holiday, say. The other, which sometimes catches people out, is a remarriage late in life. If Mary Ann married after 1911, you'll never find her listed as Moran, but you may find her in the marriage indexes, and then she'll appear in the deaths under her new married name. And if not - this caught me out once, and never again - she might always have widowed again, and married yet again!

I'd love to help, but I'm afraid your message became a bit garbled, as you can see, above. Can you re-send it in its entirety? It sounds like a wonderful story. However, let's for now address the first part. It could all be true , but family wealth, followed by 'marrying beneath him/her' and then a descent comes up often, and ,once you've traced back to find out who his parents were you may find that they weren't quite as illustrious as they were made out to be, and that David didn't fall so far. This is especially true of a story told by a daughter: the last thing she wanted to do was admit (if such was the case) that her beloved father was a miserable ne'er-do-well: she needed to make excuses for him, and thus the story began. Now, what about the rest of your question?

You've done everything right so far: the next steps are to buy her 1884 birth certificate and seek her and her father in the censuses working back from 1901.

From Mrs Elizabeth Thomas's marriage record, you will learn her father's name and occupation, and from the census you have learned the age and place of birth, and the mother's forename, so now you need to look for possible births: with a common surname in Ebbw Vale, you may need top buy a number of certificates until you find the right one - and from that record, you will learn the mother's maiden name.

You could try Moffatt.... ultimately, it was each person's own decision what they called themselves, and especially with women, you should expect the unexpected. If you cannot find this lady's death record, and she was 'last known' to have been in London, unmarried, then maybe she did, in fact , re-marry, and you should be looking for a marriage re cord under one of those names.

I note that, regarding Ancestry, you say 'they have stated...'. The only sources that are worth taking any notice of are original sources, made at the time. You ask an interesting question: which age is correct. Which is likelier to be? Men could lie about their ages to get into the army when too young: they could lie about their ages when they married, so as not to appear much older, or much younger, than their wives. You may be best off looking across a wide-ish period at Albert Clay births in the Wookey area, and check them for the right father's name (as stated on the marriage certificate), and then once you have the birth, you'll know how accurate he really was about his age.

Assuming the crossing was from Ireland to England (or Wales) you can't find shipping details: these were short domestic voyages, so passenger lists were not recorded.

Before General Registration records were introduced in July 1837, church marriages did not record father's names - and life becomes harder! I see that you know James was alive in 1854, so he should appear in the 1851 census. This will tell you where he was born, and thus where to seek his baptism. Some baptisms are indexed on this site, and many more are indexed on www.familysearch.org, but failing these, your next stop should be the relevant county record office, and you can enjoy exploring all the original records that are not yet on-line.

Blue Coat Schools and workhouses generally have very good records. Workhouse records will be in the Rotherham Archives (or they'll know where the records are) - http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/info/448/records_and_archives-information_and_advice They will probably have the local Blue Coat Schools too.You can look him up in the 1911 census, but thereafter I would not expect to find much recorded about him until he married and settled down.

She probably died in Belgium, then. It is lucky that you know she went to Antwerp - I suggest looking for her marriage and death records there. If she was middle or upper class then you could look for a newspaper announcement of her Belgian marriage in the paper local to where she used to live in England, or even in the Times.

Yes, but the point of the censuses is that they say where people came from, so you want to look him up in 1901, and 1911, and the earlier ones if applicable: the amount of information he may have given may vary from census to census. Let's hope you find a naturalisation for either brother. Yes, each town and city in Germany has archives.

The deaths on Genes Reunited only go up to 2005. Thereafter, the indexes are only available in a few archives: the National Archives' set is in the London Metropolitan Archives, and other sets are at Westminster City Archives, and the British Library. This is a reminder of how all research used to be, pre-Internet!

Yes, it really does say, in very nice, clear handwritiing, 'Reluther'. I see there is another one in the 1841 census, too, born about 1828. You could see if he presented a settlement certificate to the churchwardens when he arrived in Swanscombe, and see if his baptism appears elsewhere - have a look in www.familysearch.org. The vast majority of people on the north coast of Kent, who were not Kentish, were from London or Essex - there was lots of to-ing and fro-ing, but of course some were incomers, off ships from practically anywhere, so you may have your work cut out.. Following up the family of the Russells next door is a perfectly sensible and viable option.

You say you cannot find these things in West Ham- you may need to widen the parameters of your search a little, as of course they may have moved elsewhere. Not being able to find the births at all is odd - presumably you are relying on family knowledge for the existence of these children. If born before the 1935 marriage they would of course be under Gould, not Bowen. As to this lady's death, one reason for not being able to find a woman's death if she married, and changed her name, again (or several times!). You could seek Arthur's death, and then see if Mary remarried.

My ancestors come from near Cologne as well. You can look for Frederick and his brother in the censuses (1891, 1901 and 1911 ), see if they were naturalised (records at The National Archives and searchable under reference HO1 on their on-line catalogue), see if either left wills mentioning relatives back home (my family did), and even see where they lived here, as sometimes immigrants named their houses after their places of origin. Failing that, using modern telephone directories to see where Kohlers live now in the Cologne area, and start searching those parishes, one by one.

I haven't had an earlier question about a Charles Minter this evening - if it was from a previous session you'd need to remind me of the salient facts. For this question, you can look him up in the published army, navy and air force lists if he was an officer, and for any serviceman you can ask the relevant MOD archive: you'd need to prove you are the next of kin, and that Mr Minter is deceased. Best start with the army - Ministry of Defence, Historical Disclosure, Mail Point 400, Kentigern House, 65 Brown Street, Glasgow, G2 8EX 0141 224 3030.

If the marriage record states that Edwin Woolley was dead, then it would be rather extraordinary - though not of course impossible - if he was in fact alive. Your problem stems from not knowing very much about him. Obtain his daughter's birth record, and then his own marriage record, and seek him in each census. Then you will have a good idea of his age. You can then check deaths of Edwin Woolleys in the area where he lived, first before 1902, and then, if no joy, after, or you could check the burial record of the parish where he lived - often a useful short-cut in the case of common names (but Edwin should not be too common).

You are right to be cautious. I'd advise checking the line back to Thomas very thoroughly in the original parish registers (in Lancashire Record Office) and do bear in mind that www.familysearch.org is only an index, and an incomplete one at that. To go back further with Thomas, you should spend some time learning about him and his immediate family - what he did for a living, when he was buried and how old he was then, whether he left a will, whether he is in the parish chest material (as a pauper, or parish official, or whatever), and of course what names he gave his children. The more you lean about him the better you will be able to work out which of several possible baptisms might be his.