Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Electoral Rolls

Looking for living relatives?

Search our UK Electoral Rolls (2002-2013) and find your living relatives today.

Search Electoral Rolls

New electoral roll records

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Prosser family, London/Middlesex early 1800s

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Chris Ho :)

Chris Ho :) Report 9 Oct 2012 09:22

a google search of beloudy collier street, brings up a few items.
(does look like Collier Street on Burial image)


UK, Register of Duties Paid for Apprentices' Indentures, 1710-1811
about Josh Beloudy
Master's Name: Josh Beloudy
Apprentice Name: Edwd Ryan (who married Elizabeth Beloudy, perhaps!)
Residence Location: Clerkenwell
Payment Date: 15 Apr 1796

Master's Name: Jos Beloudy
Apprentice Name: M A J Mitchel
Residence Location: St John Clerkenwell, Middlesex
Payment Date: 5 Aug 1785

Chris :)

edits (another Daughter)

Pallot's Marriage Index for England: 1780 - 1837
about Cathe Beloudy
Name: Cathe Beloudy
Spouse: Wm Langshaw
Marriage Date: 1796
Parish: St. Pancras

۞ Cherilyn ۞

۞ Cherilyn ۞ Report 10 Oct 2012 04:05

Hmm so that is the Clerkenwell one... I am thinking the one born c1740 might have been too old to be Mary's father and perhaps he is more likely the other one b. c1758...very confusing!

Chris Ho :)

Chris Ho :) Report 10 Oct 2012 10:31

Yes, would also think the 1758 one...

(wonder if the Will would give the odd answer. lol)

Chris :)