Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Peter
|
Report
|
11 Nov 2012 17:43 |
I like that - thank you for sharing! I am going to eat but will return later to try and find out who he actually is!
|
|
Mel Fairy Godmother
|
Report
|
11 Nov 2012 17:24 |
What a lovely old chap. He actually has written on the form.
No business, depending on Old Age Pension and anything I may get by chance, I am too old, but have tried without any chance Althou' more Brains & endurance than younger men.
|
|
Peter
|
Report
|
11 Nov 2012 17:24 |
Oh no Jan, I am not saying that with great certainty and only upon past research I carried out that suggests my uncle died in 1885. But yes, not confirmed, so I should not sound so definite about such a thing.
I do love these boards - makes you question and double check your work.
Thanks.
|
|
GlitterBaby
|
Report
|
11 Nov 2012 17:19 |
1901 a possible
Name: Joseph Heathcock Age: 70 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1831 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Grace P Heathcock Gender: Male Where born: Dudley, Worcestershire, England Civil parish: Liscard Ecclesiastical parish: Egremont St John County/Island: Cheshire Country: England Street Address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Education:
Employment status: View image Registration district: Birkenhead Sub-registration district: Wallasey ED, institution, or vessel: 19 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 220 Piece: 3403 Folio: 137 Page Number: 34 Household Members: Name Age Joseph Heathcock 70 Grace P Heathcock 69 Mary Corkish 23 John Corkish 22 Charles Corkish 16 Louise Corkish 13 Sydney Corkish 7 Mona Corkish 5
|
|
brummiejan
|
Report
|
11 Nov 2012 17:14 |
When you say the 1841 is your family, are you saying you know you have that Joseph as a relative? How do you know the 1861 isn't him? I find that an odd thing to assert! How do you know one way or the other? Jan
|
|
Peter
|
Report
|
11 Nov 2012 17:11 |
Ah Jan, the 1841 is my family - but the 1861 is not. Hmmm, not so sure. I have 'my' uncle up until 1871, but then he possibly died in 1885 in Dudley.
So maybe not a relation!
But still, fabulous entry!
|
|
brummiejan
|
Report
|
11 Nov 2012 17:09 |
1851 England Census Name: Joseph Hathcock [Joseph Heathcock] Age: 30 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1821 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Eliza Hathcock Gender: M (Male) Where born: Dudley Civil parish: Dudley Ecclesiastical parish: Dudley Town: Dudley County/Island: Worcestershire
Registration district: Dudley Sub-registration district: Dudley
Joseph Hathcock 30 Eliza Hathcock 26 Wm Hathcock 6 Josh Hathcock 5 Emma Hathcock 3 Henry Hathcock 1
|
|
brummiejan
|
Report
|
11 Nov 2012 17:08 |
What a great entry for 1911! Wish he was my relative.
1841 England Census Name: Joseph Hathcock [Joseph Heathcock] Age: 17 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1824 Gender: Male Where born: Worcestershire, England Civil parish: Dudley Hundred: Halfshire (Lower Division) County/Island: Worcestershire
Registration district: Dudley Sub-registration district: Dudley
Mary Hathcock 45 Thomas Hathcock 20 Joseph Hathcock 17 John Hathcock 9
|
|
Helen
|
Report
|
11 Nov 2012 16:56 |
1861 England Census about Joseph Heathcock Name: Joseph Heathcock Age: 32 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1829 Relation: Lodger Gender: Male Where born: Dudley, Worcestershire, England Civil parish: Liverpool Ecclesiastical parish: St Mark Town: Liverpool County/Island: Lancashire Country: England Street Address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
View image Registration district: Liverpool Sub-registration district: Mount Pleasant ED, institution, or vessel: 36f Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 99 Piece: 2687 Folio: 97 Page Number: 26 Household Members: Name Age Margaret Hutton 65 Margaret Kavana 30 Alex McArthur 72 Edmund Helland 40 Grace P Heathcock 31 Joseph Heathcock 32
|
|
Peter
|
Report
|
11 Nov 2012 16:43 |
Hi there,
Just found this chap on the 1911 and wonder if he is a relation of mine. I love his commentary - does the origional image show anything else? This man seems to have died in 1913 aged 92.
I am related to the Heathcock family of Dudley and can someone look back for this chap in the census, so I can see if I can piece him into my family tree?
I have a distant uncle born 1818 in Dudley, Worcester - age not quite right to be him, but maybe this is a cousin?!
Thank you.
Peter
1911 Census Household Record Household information Address MACHINERY BROKER 101 OXFORD ST LIVERPOOL Parish West Derby Town Liverpool Type of Building Shop Number of Rooms 1 Inhabited Y Reference RG14PN22609 RG78PN1326 RD455 SD9 ED57 SN161 Administrative County Lancashire Registration District West Derby Registration Sub District West Derby Western Enumeration District 57 Householder 1 Name Joseph Heathcock Relationship to Head of Household Boarder Condition / Years Married Widower Gender M Age 87 Estimated Year of Birth 1824 Occupation Old Age Pensioner No Business Depending On Old Age Pension and Anything I May Get Chance I Am Too O Employed Y Working at Home N Place of Birth Born In A Small Place Called Musham Green At Dudley Woodside and 2 1/2
|