Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
John PATERSON & Elizabeth WATSON - Scotland
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Cherilyn | Report | 22 Feb 2013 06:54 |
Looking for any leads/chn/immigration/info on this couple please...possibility he is a mariner (given as father's occupation from Australian marriage cert of a John Alexander PATERSON, aged 28 in 1905, who states these were his parents names - seems a bit early to me but you never know! John Alexander claims he was born in Robe, South Australia but no trace of it with these names.) |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 22 Feb 2013 10:59 |
The names are quite common.........there could be a later marriage on Scotlands People, after the introduction of Civil Registration (1855) |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 22 Feb 2013 11:00 |
This MAY be the couple whose marriage you have found |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 22 Feb 2013 11:08 |
Cheryly, you will need to look on scotlandspeople: |
|||
|
Cherilyn | Report | 22 Feb 2013 11:20 |
thanks Reggie & Potty |
|||
|
Cherilyn | Report | 22 Feb 2013 11:26 |
When i search SP for Elizabeth Watson, I get no matches for statutory marriages 1855-1880 and no matches for Catholic marriages 1850-1880. That only leaves parish records 1850-1853. |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 22 Feb 2013 11:28 |
The couple on 1861 would have only been aged about 40 in 1875/6 |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 22 Feb 2013 11:29 |
The years you quote are too early...check the dates Potty listed |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 22 Feb 2013 11:32 |
Sorry, Cherilyn, that should have been 1855 - 1905 - I thought John's birth was 1905. Have done another search and there are no marriages for those names coming up between 1855 and 1877; there is one coming up between 1877 and 1900. By playing around with the dates, that marriage was in 1882 - could John have lied about his age on the marriage? |
|||
|
Cherilyn | Report | 22 Feb 2013 11:36 |
Thanks, Potty...He married in 1905 aged 28 so born c1877. Sorry for the confusion. On his son's birth cert the following year he is shown as 29. |
|||
|
Potty | Report | 22 Feb 2013 11:56 |
I can't find the 1861 family in any later census although Ancestry tie them up with later Canadian censuses. |
|||
|
GlasgowLass | Report | 22 Feb 2013 12:51 |
This may be something or nothing... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Cherilyn | Report | 23 Feb 2013 02:00 |
ooh Anne that is interesting; he WAS a fireman! (though not sure if in mining or railways) |
|||
|
Cherilyn | Report | 23 Feb 2013 02:05 |
Anne does he show up as John Alexander, or just Alexander? When you say 'replaced by his wife', do you mean Lilian Beatrice shows up at the same adddress? |
|||
|
Cherilyn | Report | 23 Feb 2013 02:11 |
From NLA Trove - not sure it is the same man - John Alexander died in 1955 |
|||
|
GlasgowLass | Report | 23 Feb 2013 10:11 |
Cherilyn, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Cherilyn | Report | 23 Feb 2013 11:39 |
Thank you, Anne, this is amazing...well bigamy might explain why he would give the wrong parents names on his (2nd?) marriage! How very intruiging...so maybe when Agnes' death notice refers to him as 'the late' it was because he was presumed dead? |
|||
|
Cherilyn | Report | 23 Feb 2013 11:42 |
Where was daughter Margaret in all this I wonder? Can't find her birth in WA at all... |
|||
|
GlasgowLass | Report | 23 Feb 2013 14:37 |
I will collect the ER data but am certain that the Alexander Paterson who married Agnes Annie Bartholemew is a different man because they married in 1904. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Cherilyn | Report | 23 Feb 2013 14:41 |
oh I see what you mean....so that must be a different Agnes with JA in 1903?! |