Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Single word search
As a way of saying thank you to our subscribers, we have launched Genes Extras. You'll find exclusive competitions and discounts on family history magazines, days out and much more.
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Trying to find ancestor
|Profile||Posted by||Options||Post Date|
|Simon||Report||13 Nov 2002 10:19|
Alison, I'm afraid that we will just have to agree to disagree. I don't believe that it is usual to just trace the male line anymore. I agree that it is easier because (generally) you will be dealing with just one surname. But I really don't see why this paternalist attitude should prevail today. As far as I am concerned I am a composite of all the genes I inherited from both my parents - they are both equally important to me, and so it goes on for each generation backwards. I also take the time to research siblings (perhaps that is a bit obsessive, I agree!) because I am interest in 'family' history - what they did, how they lived, why people moved around, what living and housing conditions were like, how people were affected by various laws....it goes on, and some people will no doubt say that I do to! Best wishes, Simon.