Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

The British Newspaper Archive

British Newspaper Archive

Read about historical events at the time they were happening. Perhaps you'll discover your ancestor in their local newspaper?

Start searching

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Deliberate mistake?

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

wisechild

wisechild Report 11 Oct 2012 07:08

Sure have Reggie

Reggie

Reggie Report 10 Oct 2012 18:01

Remember that the people transcribing probably don't know what a numerical half is............they probably are familiar only with decimals

I hope you've posted the necessary correction(s)

wisechild

wisechild Report 10 Oct 2012 15:37

You´re probably right Jonesey. Hadn´t thought of that, but then, I knew how old they should be.

Jonesey

Jonesey Report 10 Oct 2012 15:23

The person who transcribed the records obviously assumed that their ages had been recorded as months rather than years.

More a case of lack of knowledge of the principles of biology rather than weak mathematical abilities.

wisechild

wisechild Report 10 Oct 2012 14:54

On the 1911 census, 2 sisters shown as aged 0.
I knew it was an error because one of them got married in 1921.
The original shows 1 aged 81/2 & the other 6 1/2.
Both transcribed with yob 1911.
Was it too difficult to work out the halves without a calculator?