Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Genes Extras

Genes Reunited subscription bonuses

As a way of saying thank you to our subscribers, we have launched Genes Extras. You'll find exclusive competitions and discounts on family history magazines, days out and much more.

Take me to Genes Extras

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Advise from individuals more experianced, please.

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

InspectorGreenPen

InspectorGreenPen Report 2 Apr 2013 13:44

It also depends on the date.

Changes in the way illegitimate children were recorded were introduced in 1850, 1875 and again in 1853.

Prior to 1875 it was not possible for the putative father to attend and sigh the register, even if he wanted to, although the rules were sometimes misinterpreted. The 1850 regulation clarified this with the words "No putative father is to be allowed to sign an entry in the character of 'Father'"

CupCakes

CupCakes Report 2 Apr 2013 06:24

Reggie is correct about the legal issues but the reality on the ground in England is something else.

In many areas of the country those registering the births didn't bother to check if a woman was legally married to the man named as the father. I've come across so many incidents in my research

Reggie

Reggie Report 31 Mar 2013 11:05

Stuart is not quite correct in his post

If the parents were not married, the father could not be named on the cert unless he was present at the registration.

Only a married woman was permitted to name her child's father on the cert in his absence.

lilyann

lilyann Report 30 Mar 2013 20:51

Thank You so much, i wil have to send of for her birth cert as she is only registered under her mothers maiden name. Thank you for advice and suggestions, it has helped and sure will continue to in my quest,
Sue

Gwyn in Kent

Gwyn in Kent Report 30 Mar 2013 19:34

If you look on FreeBMD for the birth of Iris and click on the blue page number of that entry, you will see other births registered on the same page.
It is possible that you will see a registration in her mother's surname and another in her father's surname if he acknowledged her and went to the Registrar with the mother, if they weren't married.

Gwyn

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 30 Mar 2013 17:33

Yes - if a mother was unmarried then the child is registered in the mother's maiden name. If the father went to the register office with the mother and claimed paternity then the child could also be registered in his name too. There would however be two entries in the index - one in mother's maiden name and one in the father's name.

If the father didn't go to the register office then there would be just the one in the mother's maiden name - even if the parents subsequently married. In later years (sometime in the 1900's but not sure of exact year) an illegitimate child could be legitimized after the parent's marriage and re-registered in the father's name.

Kath. x

Stuart

Stuart Report 30 Mar 2013 16:22

Very probable. The birth certificate may name the father, but i believe if he wasn't at the registration, or didn't acknowledge the child as his then the birth would be registered in the Mothers surname at the time.

lilyann

lilyann Report 30 Mar 2013 16:05

I have found, who I believe to be my Grandfathers sister, however, her surname is recorded as the same as her mothers maiden name. Is it normal for children born, as they used to say out of wedlock, to be registard in this way. She, Iris was born in the first 1/4 of the same year my g/grandparents were married. Any thoughts from those more knowledgable is very much appriciated.