Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Electoral Rolls

Looking for living relatives?

Search our UK Electoral Rolls (2002-2013) and find your living relatives today.

Search Electoral Rolls

New electoral roll records

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

1 Year hard labour 1910

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

66luke

66luke Report 7 May 2013 19:52

i Have a relative who got sentenced to 1 year hard labour in 1910
What i would like to find out is whether he would of had to serve the
whole year or would he of got out early for good behaviour ?

Eringobragh1916

Eringobragh1916 Report 7 May 2013 20:58

I believe the sentences handed down at the time were served in full...depending on when in 1910 he was sentenced you could try checking 1911 Census to see if he was at home or in Prison...

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 7 May 2013 21:00

remember that he might be shown under his initials only if he was in prison ...............

............ or is that not the case on the 1911 census???

Cynthia

Cynthia Report 8 May 2013 13:32

Luke is a fairly new poster - friendly message on how to return to thread sent. :-)

66luke

66luke Report 8 May 2013 21:27

Thanks very much for the feed back.
My relative is indeed on the 1911 census and if he were to have served the full sentence he would of been released Oct 1911 . His son was born 1912 April and that means its not possible that he is the father !!!!!!!!

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 8 May 2013 21:56

Do you mean that he was in prison on the 1911 Census??




He might not be the biological father ...................... but he is the legal father


Any child born to married woman was assumed to be the child of her husband, unless she had the agreement of another man to name him.

This applied even if the woman was a widow ................... I had one case where a husband who had been dead for 10 years was named as a child's father.



But you might want to consider ...........

.......... did he escape for a short while

......... was he released early "for good behaviour"

CupCakes

CupCakes Report 9 May 2013 07:25

Even back then they let people out for good behavour. A one year sentence doesn't necessarily mean one year served....

MarieCeleste

MarieCeleste Report 9 May 2013 19:44

May be some useful info on these links:

http://vcp.e2bn.org/justice/page11687-sentencing-and-prison-reforms.html

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/candp/punishment/g09/g09cs2.htm

Apparently "time off" was stopped in the prison reform of 1877, unclear when it started happening again.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 9 May 2013 19:51

MC ............

I had that same uncertainty,

which is why I only suggested "was he released early for good behaviour"

66luke

66luke Report 9 May 2013 20:23

Thanks again for all the feed back .
Just to clarify that he was in prison on the night of the census 1911
To cloud things a bit more , his wife had a lodger on the night of the 1911 census and her son shares the same christian name as him
Thanks for the two links , i will investigate shortly

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 9 May 2013 20:26

uh huh .................


Roger the lodger????????????