Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

ann forster, sunderland

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Mark

Mark Report 8 Mar 2014 16:45

I believe that my g.grsndmother is ann forster, bn in 1883 in sunderland. She was married to john smith and had my grandfather nicholas swan smith in 1910.

I do not seem to be able to find ann's family, and the family name of smith is not exactly helping!!

any assistance/ideas would be great.

mark.

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 8 Mar 2014 17:11

You say you "believe" your great grandmother was Ann Forster. Do you have your grandfather's birth certificate to confirm this?

I can't find a marriage of Ann Forster to John Smith. Do you have the marriage certificate?

Is this your great grandmother and your grandfather in the 1911 census?:-

1911 census transcription details for: 19 Cornhill Road Southwick

National Archive Reference:
RG14PN30235 RG78PN1743 RD555 SD4 ED1 SN247
Reg. District: Sunderland
Sub District: Southwick
Parish: Southwick
Enum. District: 1

Address: 19 Cornhill Road Southwick
County: Durham

Name Relation Condition/
Yrs married Sex Age Birth Year Occupation Where Born

SMITH, Annie Head Widow F 28 1883 Durham Sunderland<<<<<<<<<<<<
SMITH, Robert Son M 5 1906 Durham Sunderland
SMITH, Elizabeth Daughter F 2 1909 Durham Sunderland
SMITH, Nicholas Son M 1 1910 Durham Sunderland<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Kath. x

Mark

Mark Report 8 Mar 2014 17:40

Hi Kath

yes, I have my grandfathers birth certificate and Ann's name looks like forster on the record. I had seen the 1911 census, but this is where I then start to lose the trail.

mark.

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 8 Mar 2014 17:46

Possible marriage?

Marriages Sep 1900 (>99%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Foster Annie Easington 10a 766
Smith John Easington 10a 766

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 8 Mar 2014 17:55

According to the 1911 census she'd been married 10 years, had 4 children, one had died.

Joseph

Joseph Report 8 Mar 2014 17:57


This MAY be them in 1901

1901 at 6, Back George Street, Sunderland
SMITH, John Head Married M 25 1876 Labourer In Ironyard Sunderland
SMITH, Ann Wife Married F 18 1883 Sunderland
SMITH, William Boarder Single M 20 1881 Labourer In Ironyard Sunderland
SMITH, James Father Widower M 58 1843 Labourer In Ironyard Sunderland

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 8 Mar 2014 18:06

Possible in 1901?

1901 England Census
about Ann Smith Name: Ann Smith
Age: 18
Estimated birth year: abt 1883
Relation to Head: Wife
Gender: Female
Spouse: John Smith
Birth Place: Sunderland, Durham, England
Civil Parish: Sunderland
Ecclesiastical parish: Monkwearmouth Venerable Bede
Town: Sunderland
County/Island: Durham
Country: England
Street address:
District: Sunderland
Sub-registration district: Monkwearmouth
ED, institution, or vessel: 7
Neighbors: View others on page
Piece: 4722
Folio: 36
Page Number: 63
Household schedule number: 375
Household Members: Name Age
John Smith 25
Ann Smith 18
William Smith 20
James Smith 58

William is a boarder, James is father, a widower.


Mark

Mark Report 8 Mar 2014 19:44

This is really good, thanks. Any idea on how I trace the Forster name back further.

Joseph

Joseph Report 8 Mar 2014 21:58

????
Births Dec 1882
Forster Ann Sunderland 10a 640

This is an strange name maybe “Forster” mis-heard by the recorder???

1891 at 43, South Johnson Street, Bishop Wearmouth, Sunderland
DORCER, Micheal Head Married M 35 1856 Ship Yard Labourer Ireland
DORCER, Ann Wife Married F 30 1861 Ireland
DORCER, Mary Daughter Single F 9 1882 Scholar Sunderland, Durham
DORCER, Annie Daughter Single F 8 1883 Scholar Sunderland, Durham
DORCER, Charles Son Single M 0 (6M) 1891 Sunderland, Durham

Good luck,
Joseph

MargaretM

MargaretM Report 8 Mar 2014 22:10

It's hard to pinpoint Annie in the 1891 census. I think you'd have to order the marriage certificate to get father's name.

Incidentally I have Fosters in my tree and they're sometimes spelled Foster and sometimes Forster. Something to do with that northern accent, methinks.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 8 Mar 2014 23:30

Certainly the Dorcers are not on any other census, or record.


It is certainly possible that Michael's Irish accent confused the enumerator :-)

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 9 Mar 2014 00:26

Mary Dorcer on the 1891 census (the eldest daughter on that census) could be this birth if the name was mis-heard:-

Name: FORSTER, Mary
Registration district: Sunderland
County: Durham
Year of registration: 1881
Quarter of registration: Apr-May-Jun
Mother's maiden name: Not available before 1911 Q3
Volume no: 10A
Page no: 701

Kath. x

Mark

Mark Report 9 Mar 2014 11:55

Thank you everyone. Several lines to look at.

Just when you think you have a link away from Smith, which must be the hardest name to trace, never simple!

Mark.