Genealogy Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
New Military Records
Was your ancestor a war hero?
View thousands of brand new military records, including Chelsea Pensioner records, Military Nurses, Prisoners of war and much more.
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
I am so confused
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Billy | Report | 5 Dec 2007 13:41 |
|
I have my Grandfathers Marraige cert dated the 21/08/1918 ( Daniel Ingham ) and on it . it says he was aged 34, so he was born in 1884 and his father was William Ingham who was a cotton card room jobber. BUT when i go back 34 years to 1884 i cannot find Daniel with a Father William, so i checked the 1891 census and still nothing But if i go back even further to 1881 census i find a william who was a cotton card room jobber with a son daniel aged 7 meaning that Daniel was actually 44 and born in 1874 is this possible. Its doing my head in and as you can see i am only on to my grand parents H E L P . |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 5 Dec 2007 13:45 |
|
Billy, have you found the birth registration for the one born in 1874? What age was his bridge on the marriage certificate? |
|||
|
Billy | Report | 5 Dec 2007 13:48 |
|
Where do i start when im looking for a Death cert |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 5 Dec 2007 13:50 |
|
Billy, could this be the 1881 Daniel in 1901? |
|||
|
Billy | Report | 5 Dec 2007 13:53 |
|
FANTASTIC, What does that mean then |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 5 Dec 2007 13:57 |
|
If that is him, he was a pauper in the workhouse. |
|||
|
Billy | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:01 |
|
The bride was aged 39 on the Marriage cert but again she was actually 49 |
|||
|
Billy | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:02 |
|
The Marraige took place in Bury and yes it was blackburn |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:09 |
|
Dont know for sure, but maybe they both reduced their ages by ten years for some reason I cannot explain! |
|||
|
Billy | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:12 |
|
not yet im really slow at this game, i shall start that next |
|||
|
Sue C | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:15 |
|
This 1891 on findmypast seems to tie up with the 1881 except that Daniel beomes David. The image on this one cleary reads David. I have looked at the 1881 image and think that might be David too and that he has been mistranscribed as Daniel. Perhaps someone else can take a look at 1881 image for a second opinion. |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:18 |
|
What was Edith's fathers name? Had she been married previously? |
|||
|
Billy | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:19 |
|
thank you all for your genorous help |
|||
|
Billy | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:20 |
|
Ediths Fathers name was John William Mercer and he was Deceased |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:23 |
|
Sue, I think the 1881 actually says Daniel, but could be David as well. |
|||
|
KeithInFujairah | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:31 |
|
This looks like them in 1881 |
|||
|
Billy | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:39 |
|
Kieth you are a STAR, what can i say, so Edith was born in 1870ish and Daniel was born in 1873ish |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:39 |
|
Billy, |
|||
|
Billy | Report | 5 Dec 2007 14:48 |
|
Thanks M, this is all getting confusing i am a bit nieve when it comes to it |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 5 Dec 2007 15:18 |
|
Billy, |
|||
