General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

New Scottish Census

New Scottish census records

Do you have Scottish ancestors?

Perhaps you do and you just didn't know! Search our brand new Scottish census records today and discover if you have Scottish roots.

Search Scottish Census


  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Who killed Archie Mitchell?

Page 0 + 1 of 19

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. »
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date


Lorraine Report 22 Feb 2010 22:36

i think the plan was for bradley to die and be blamed all long for the murder, it was in the papers last month he was going to die, the twist on the live episode was who actually did it, and nobody except max and stacey knows that and it wasn't mentioned tonight, by either of them. When you saw stacey in her room you could hear the voice overs from the live episode of her confessing to max, they only had to dub that over the already recorded episode.


AnninGlos Report 22 Feb 2010 22:18

mmm and the one with the flowers. Yes I suppose they could have done it over the weekend.


TeresaW Report 22 Feb 2010 22:03

I would have thought they knew Bradley was going to die, and if you think about it, there were a couple of very short scenes mentioning Bradley as the murderer, which could easily have been done over the weekend and cut into the episode.


AnninGlos Report 22 Feb 2010 22:01

So, how did they record tonights episode then? Because Bradley was mentioned as the murderer. Did they rush off and record it on Saturday? Or had they recorded several different scenarios. I suppose they could have known Bradley was going to die. Confusing isn't it?


TeresaW Report 21 Feb 2010 12:44

Bob, you're thinking of Blanche in Corrie. They haven't written her out yet, but she died in real life.


MarionfromScotland Report 21 Feb 2010 12:14

No Bob she is alive and well. Her OH jim had a stroke in real life and he is in it too....small parts


Bobtanian Report 21 Feb 2010 12:12

correct me if i am wrong, but didn't june (Dot) wassername die?


MarionfromScotland Report 21 Feb 2010 11:38

And...Dot takes Dotty to her mother.,Maybe Nasty Nick will be back


TeresaW Report 21 Feb 2010 11:36

Oooo this should be interesting....and will distract us from noticing that nothing is being mentioned about Archie while they catch up on those


MarionfromScotland Report 21 Feb 2010 11:12

Theres a bit in the sunday mail.

* Lucas's crimes come back to haunt him as jordan decides to dig up Trinas tree in search of whatever it is sugar keeps sniffing at.*


MarionfromScotland Report 21 Feb 2010 10:52

The tree gets dug up this week...


Bobtanian Report 21 Feb 2010 00:24

Strange turn of phrase, that!!

sleeping/ slept with.........should think that sleeping was the LAST thing on their minds..........LOL



Sally Report 20 Feb 2010 15:29

I thought it might have been Stacey's mate, in the pub scene Stacey's Mum called Stacey an angel, and a strange look came over Stacey's mates face.......and I thought.....oooooh here is the twist........but no. 'twas Stacey after all......

......and Whirley, I was always expecting that Archie was going to be revealed as Ronnie's daughter's father.....

.......I was wrong thinking that it was Bradley that had been and gone and dunnit......


Whirley Report 20 Feb 2010 15:06

I always suspected there was abit more going on with Ronnie/Archie and when she said he'd raped her, then I thought, ha ha that's prob true.


TeresaW Report 20 Feb 2010 14:46

Well, I think it might possibly be true, because that would then explain why Archie was so keen to be rid of the baby...and when Danielle turned up, why he was so keen to be rid of her again. He wasn't in the least bit sorry that she'd died either.


AnninGlos Report 20 Feb 2010 14:43

TW yes I saw that when she spoke to Bradley it panned to Ryan, and she kept looking at Ryan the other day too.

What about Ronnie's 'confession' about Archie though, do you think it was true that he raped her? Or is she fantasising?

Karen in the desert

Karen in the desert Report 20 Feb 2010 14:10

If it IS Ryan's child, then we could see a nice twist if he and Janine get it together......



Lorraine Report 20 Feb 2010 14:09

could it be jacks and that is why he was desperate to get them to leave the square as he didn't want Ronnie to find out!!

My OH keeps telling me this is NOT REAL LIFE!!!


TeresaW Report 20 Feb 2010 13:58

no it's Ryans. When Bradley realised what Stacey was saying, the camera panned to Ryan. I'm certain it's his.


MarionfromScotland Report 20 Feb 2010 13:44

Homer lol.

He must go through a lot of shoes...he is always shuffling along.