Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Single word search
As a way of saying thank you to our subscribers, we have launched Genes Extras. You'll find exclusive competitions and discounts on family history magazines, days out and much more.
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
|Profile||Posted by||Options||Post Date|
|Martin||Report||17 Dec 2002 00:33|
Bruce Wall writes "have found that there are a few in the same district with the same Christian or given name. What's going on back then??" I think you'll find its down to infant mortality rates. I've been playing at this family tree stuff for a while (appear to be (distantly) related to the wife!), and have got several charts where there's george, george, george before we move on to harry. There's also a number of george, harry, henry, george type lists, so even once you were toddling, you weren't safe. But given that seven or eight generations of perhaps eight or a dozen children seem to get by with little more than george, henry, richard and thomas, why on earth did someone suddenly throw in an "Abimelech"?! What was the change that brought this one about (in 1860)? Cheers, Martin