Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Another Edwards Dilemma !
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Carole | Report | 1 Dec 2008 16:04 |
|
Have yet again downloaded from the 1851 census, and have only come up with half of the family. The main people I'd like to find out about must be on the other page. Obviously, if I knew their names, things would be a bit easier. |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 1 Dec 2008 17:20 |
|
I can only find 1 marriage of a Charles Dodd to an Edwards & she is Martha not Elizabeth |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 1 Dec 2008 21:53 |
|
are there any other siblings of Sarah with a more unusual name that you could identify the birth reg for. There are too many Sarah's to be certain which is the right one. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
mgnv | Report | 2 Dec 2008 05:10 |
|
The Joseph Orton in the 1861 census that Carole mentioned and Catherine posted definitely shows his a=10, but I think this was probably a mistranscription by the enumerator. This is the same age as Sarah, and also he's a hears(e) driver. I suspect his a=19. This ties in with: |
|||
|
Carole | Report | 2 Dec 2008 11:43 |
|
Hi Catherine.....It looks like I was the one who gave you the wrong address for the 1851 census.My apologies for that, but thanks for other info you've passed on which has been a great help. |
|||