Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

Findmypast DNA Banner

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

TRY TO FIND

Login to Add Reply Watch This
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Netty

Netty Report 18 Aug 2009 21:03

Your welcome Linda. x.

Linda

Linda Report 18 Aug 2009 20:35

hi netty

thank you so much for yoiur help you have confirmed what i had found....what threw me was john 1852 has put john lee as his father on his marriage cert....once again thank you for saving my sanity...regards linda

Netty

Netty Report 18 Aug 2009 20:00

1881 John has gone back to using Lee surname.

Name: John Lee
Age: 27
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1854
Relation: Son
Mother's Name: Mary
Gender: Male
Where born: Newcastle, Northumberland, England

Civil parish: Newcastle On Tyne All Sts
County/Island: Northumberland
Country: England

Street Address: 8 Albion Row
Education:

Employment status: View image
Occupation: Forgeman (Iron)

Registration district: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Sub-registration district: Byker
ED, institution, or vessel: 2a
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members: Name Age

Mary Brownlee 40 Widow.
John Lee 27
James Brownlee 18

Netty

Netty Report 18 Aug 2009 19:58

Looks like a possible marriage to me.


Marriages Dec 1869 (>99%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BROWNLEE James Newcastle T. 10b 241 <<<<<<
BRYDON Lizzie Newcastle T. 10b 241
LEE Mary Newcastle T. 10b 241 <<<<<<<<
Thompson John Newcastle T 10b 241

Netty

Netty Report 18 Aug 2009 19:56

1871 Mary is a widow.

Name: John Brownlee
Age: 17
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1854
Relation: Son
Mother's Name: Mary
Gender: Male
Where born: Newcastle
Civil parish: All Saints
Ecclesiastical parish: Byker
Town: Newcastle
County/Island: Northumberland
Country: England
Registration district: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Sub-registration district: Byker
ED, institution, or vessel: 3
Household schedule number: 145
Household Members: Name Age

Mary Brownlee 33 Widow.
John Brownlee 17
Mary Ann Braonlee 12
James Braonlee 7



Source Citation: Class: RG10; Piece: 5105; Folio: 61; Page: 24; GSU roll: 847391.

Netty

Netty Report 18 Aug 2009 19:55

1861 Mary Lee is unmarried with 2 children.

Name: John Lee
Age: 9
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1852
Relation: Grandson
Gender: Male
Where born: Newcastle, Northumberland, England

Civil parish: All Saints
Ecclesiastical parish: Byker
Town: Newcastle
County/Island: Northumberland
Country: England

Street Address: York st

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage: View image

Registration district: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Sub-registration district: Byker
ED, institution, or vessel: 3
Neighbors: View others on page
Household schedule number: 101
Household Members: Name Age

Robert Lee 69 Widower. Book seller.
Mary Lee 26 G Daughter. Unm.
John Lee 9 G Son.
Mary Ann Lee 1 G Daughter.



Source Citation: Class: RG9; Piece: 3832; Folio: 59; Page: 18; GSU roll: 850884.

Linda

Linda Report 18 Aug 2009 18:51

i am trying to find members of the lee family gateshead/newcastle upon tyne....i have a marriage cert for john lee married 26th june 1881 to mary jane armstrong his witness was james brownlee john is a labourer and his father also john lee was i think a carpenter...in the 1881 census they are in the same household both down as mary brownlee's sons??? .....in 1871 census i have mary, john, mary ann, and james all as brownlee....and i cant find them in the 1861 at all...can anyone check my info to see if i am reading it right and can anyone explain the lee-brownlee problem?