Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
John Cook born ~1806 in Suffolk
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
John | Report | 29 Dec 2009 00:18 |
Hi all |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 29 Dec 2009 00:26 |
There are a number of George Cook's listed as baptised in Suffolk on the IGI (Familysearch.org) but as I'm not familiar with the area, its best if you had a look! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 29 Dec 2009 02:38 |
In 1841 they are living in Nayland Suffolk according to the census. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
John | Report | 29 Dec 2009 03:28 |
The George Cook I was interested in is located in No 9 Prices street , Southwark London in the 1951 census. |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 29 Dec 2009 03:35 |
Oh I see I didn't realize you knew John was George's father, it sounded like you thought he wasn't. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
John | Report | 29 Dec 2009 07:25 |
Yes ;-) George is a Boiler maker in 1861, 3a ravensbourne terrace, Deptford the interesting thing with George was he had a son aged ~7 (another George) who wasn't at home on census night 1861, he was staying with the widow Mary Parry in southwark who George senior worked for in the 1851 census, Mary relationship to George junior is described as her nephew... |
|||
|
John | Report | 29 Dec 2009 07:37 |
I think I have found George snr Marriage record to Eliza Mason in Lambeth in 1852, I've ordered the certificate to see if I can find some dates to work with. |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 29 Dec 2009 09:23 |
Hm, in 1851, Thomas Parry is born c1811 Ireland, Mary Ann Parry c1795 North Wales. I would not be convinced she was George Cook's sister either, lol. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 29 Dec 2009 09:59 |
I lived for 9 years just outside Sudbury and travelled through Nayland to work. These places are on the Essex Suffolk boarders. |
|||
|
Rallyreg | Report | 29 Dec 2009 10:04 |
Have ypu tried contacting the Suffolk Family History Society. They have a number of Parish records on CD for sale, or may be have some one that can search the Parish records for you. Try their web site |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 29 Dec 2009 10:22 |
I think your George was born Sudbury 1831 and it is not the George born Nayland 1829/30. Nayland is quite a way from Subury and is nearer Colchester Essex. |
|||
|
chrissiex | Report | 29 Dec 2009 10:24 |
Mel your 1871 Nayland George is the one I identified in 1851 and I do think it is likely that is the 1841 George that John has been looking at, and not his George the boiler maker at all. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 29 Dec 2009 10:36 |
On the 1861 census for your George and Wife Eliza they have a child Charles Cook and George's brother Alfred is with them born Sudbury Suffolk. He is a Silk Velvet Weaver. |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 29 Dec 2009 10:39 |
This could be the birth of Alfred. |
|||
|
John | Report | 29 Dec 2009 12:26 |
Alfred is a bit of a mystery to me at the moment, Can't find any record of him and George together other than the 1861 census!. |
|||
|
John | Report | 27 Jan 2010 05:49 |
Hi all |
|||
|
Mary | Report | 14 Dec 2010 20:24 |
For general information following a comment by a researcher : Nayland may be nearer to Colchester than Sudbury (7 rather than 12 miles), but it IS in Suffolk and the registration district for Nayland is SUDBURY, not Colchester. The same mistake is often made when looking at addresses in census records as Nayland has a postal address of Colchester because it is the nearest main post office, but otherwise has nothing to do with Colchester in Essex so far as records are concerned. As a result, for example, sometimes army records and war graves site sometimes state that someone was born in Colchester, but that could have been merely the postal address. Colchester has been a garrison town since Roman times, so lads over the border in Suffolk often joined up there. You always have to be more careful with places that are close to county boundaries so it is always worth looking either side of the border for records. |
|||
|
Mel Fairy Godmother | Report | 15 Dec 2010 09:44 |
Mary thats just what I was trying to explain at the time. Thank you Mel. |