Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Parents of Joshua Jackson
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Michelle | Report | 5 Dec 2010 15:53 |
|
Hi |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 5 Dec 2010 15:56 |
|
1841 |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 5 Dec 2010 16:00 |
|
1851: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 5 Dec 2010 16:09 |
|
There is an IGI SUBMITTED baptism at Manchester Cathedral for Joshua Jackson son of James and Hannah, on 4th May 1836, birthdate given as 13th Jan 1836. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 5 Dec 2010 16:09 |
|
residence: Manchester, Lancashire, England |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 5 Dec 2010 16:12 |
|
IGI has two SUBMITTED marriages of a James Jackson to a Hannah: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 5 Dec 2010 16:32 |
|
Hannah remarried in 1861. |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 5 Dec 2010 16:41 |
|
Baptisms: 4 May 1836 Collegiate, Manchester, Lancashire, England |
|||
|
alviegal | Report | 5 Dec 2010 16:42 |
|
James is a publican in 1841 but is blind by 1851. |
|||
|
Michelle | Report | 5 Dec 2010 16:43 |
|
Hiya |
|||
|
Vera | Report | 5 Dec 2010 16:55 |
|
The only thing I can suggest is to send for one of the childrens birth certificates....that will give her maiden name... |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 5 Dec 2010 18:45 |
|
2 possibles |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 5 Dec 2010 18:49 |
|
Marriages Sep 1854 |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 5 Dec 2010 18:55 |
|
Pollinson could well have been mistaken for Rawlinson. |
|||