Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
William Greenwood 1836 Crompton
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Simon | Report | 4 Feb 2012 08:30 |
|
Thsnks Both |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 3 Feb 2012 23:41 |
|
If this is them in 1841, then Hannah's birth certificate will have Father's name also: (Address looks like Fir Lane, as in 1851) |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 3 Feb 2012 23:37 |
|
Is this he in 1851? |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 3 Feb 2012 23:31 |
|
you need to buy the death certificate of the William given above |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 3 Feb 2012 23:27 |
|
Why do you think he is alive in 1901? |
|||
|
Simon | Report | 3 Feb 2012 20:53 |
|
Thanks everyone but I am confused |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 2 Feb 2012 23:52 |
|
the connection between Henry & Samuel - presumably Hannah's sisters son |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 2 Feb 2012 23:25 |
|
Samuel Lomax was with William & Hannah in the 1881 & 1891. Seeing as he's with their son James in 1901 suggests William & Hannah may no longer be around: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 2 Feb 2012 23:18 |
|
Possible death for Hannah? |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 2 Feb 2012 23:13 |
|
good point patchem |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 2 Feb 2012 22:56 |
|
How do you know he is still alive in 1901? |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 2 Feb 2012 22:44 |
|
There were probably tmore than 2 in the Rochdale and Oldham area.I have one set in my tree of similar ages. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Simon | Report | 2 Feb 2012 21:52 |
|
Annie would have been 36 in 1901 not 26. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 2 Feb 2012 21:49 |
|
If you can not answer my questions then waste of my time trying to help |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 2 Feb 2012 21:48 |
|
1901 only because of location |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Simon | Report | 2 Feb 2012 21:47 |
|
Thats them Jan |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
brummiejan | Report | 2 Feb 2012 21:44 |
|
For location |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 2 Feb 2012 21:44 |
|
Where is Crompton ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 2 Feb 2012 21:43 |
|
Where was he in 1891 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Simon | Report | 2 Feb 2012 21:37 |
|
Where is he in 1901? |
|||
Researching: |
|||