Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
manchester to liverpool
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
jax | Report | 9 Feb 2012 23:31 |
|
?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Feb 2012 23:16 |
|
1871?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 9 Feb 2012 22:57 |
|
the only William & Sarah Smith I can find on the 1881 census is this one, but Sarah was born 1856/7 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 9 Feb 2012 22:39 |
|
Sarah actually married in Manchester not Salford |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Feb 2012 22:28 |
|
Thats what I have been saying she was baptised Welch she is on the census as Welch how do you know her birth was not registered as Welch?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 9 Feb 2012 22:01 |
|
No....she was sarah ann walsh...she married william smith in 1875 in salford....somrtimes the name is mis-transcribed. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Feb 2012 21:52 |
|
Is that not Sarah's birth that I gave you then in the name of Welch? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 9 Feb 2012 20:47 |
|
i never did manage to track them down on 1851 census due to the name transcriptions....The first one is correct....never was able to get hold of sarahs ann's birth certificate eigther or her other siblings.William |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Feb 2012 19:24 |
|
Shame the age at death were not entered on the index's back then |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Feb 2012 17:49 |
|
If your ancestor is Walsh why are you tracing Welch? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Feb 2012 17:47 |
|
1851 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Feb 2012 17:39 |
|
1861 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Feb 2012 17:35 |
|
So what is their name Welch or Walsh?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Feb 2012 17:31 |
|
and Margaret |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Feb 2012 17:27 |
|
Is this it? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 9 Feb 2012 17:08 |
|
Hi...Re: sarah ann walsh..i found details for both margaret and sarah on the IGI family search sight.... both born st geoge hulme to paremts Edward walsh and margaret... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
cane | Report | 9 Feb 2012 17:04 |
|
Hi...Re: sarah ann walsh..i found details for both margaret and sarah on the IGI family search sight.... both born st geoge hulme to paremts Edward walsh and margaret... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Feb 2012 23:14 |
|
So are you saying that is not true what I found Flick? Maybe if they were babies they did'nt bother too much with the burial thing? but I have now found this |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 8 Feb 2012 23:07 |
|
Only births were able to escape registration before 1875 |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Feb 2012 23:01 |
|
I am struggling to find this family on a census nor can I see a birth for a Sarah Ann Walsh in 1854. |
|||
Researching: |
|||