General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Sportsmen?
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Julie | Report | 28 Feb 2010 10:02 |
|
No that doesn't mean she should be celibate.....but she doesn't have to go with a man who is/was her babyfathers friend who also happens to be a married man with children himself.......im sure there's plenty of single men about |
|||
|
maggiewinchester | Report | 28 Feb 2010 09:59 |
|
She may be the mother of Bridges child - but if they're no longer together, surely that doesn't mean she should be celibate. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Blue Moon | Report | 28 Feb 2010 09:53 |
|
To start withTerry is married with childern let alone Terry and Bridge were best of friends !! |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 28 Feb 2010 09:49 |
|
I think it's more to do with the fact that she is the mother of his child |
|||
|
maggiewinchester | Report | 28 Feb 2010 09:43 |
|
The refusal of Bridges to shake hands with Terry at yesterday's football match just about sums up today's footballers - they're definitely not sportsmen, they're ridiculously overpaid childish attention seeking morons! |
|||
Researching: |
|||