General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

blank find

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Lorraine

Lorraine Report 9 Apr 2010 21:49

Hi just want to pick any ones brain really.what would you think and do if you could not find any of your family in 1891 census but then they popped up again in 1908. any ideas on this would put a new slant on this puzzle.thanking you very much L(confused)

AnninGlos

AnninGlos Report 9 Apr 2010 21:51

Presume you mean 1901 but could they have been mistranscribed in the 1891?

Lorraine

Lorraine Report 9 Apr 2010 22:29

hi, no i did a check in the 1881 census because her birth was 1879 and she was 2 then. i have looked in the 1891 when she was 12 but couldn't find her so i looked in the 1901 and couldn't find her there even under the alias's i have for her.then she married in 1908 and again in 1944.i'm baffled. in what way would they have been miss-transcribed please.

Gwyn in Kent

Gwyn in Kent Report 9 Apr 2010 22:31

Post the names and what you know about birth year or place of birth.
People will take a look for you.


Gwyn

Lorraine

Lorraine Report 9 Apr 2010 22:58

Didnt think of that thanks.....Emma Neeves dob 15/04/1879 Lenham in Wychling
1881 census shows William H at 23 head,Frances at 19 wife Emma at 2 and William I at 2 mnths.After this it doesn't come up,,, in the 1891 census or the 1901 census, cant find any of the family ..any help on this would be apprieciated. I have tried all the family names. in 1919 she married in canterbury the again in 1944 in canterbury. if she changed her name does any one known how i might find out what it could be (shot in the dark!) or if they moved overseas...How would i be able to find out?These are my fathers grandparents side and they have caused no end of trouble with name changes and evasion.thank you.L

Choccy

Choccy Report 9 Apr 2010 23:08



here's William -


1891 England Census
Name: William J Neaves
Age: 11
Estimated birth year: abt 1880
Relation: Nephew
Gender: Male
Where born: Lenham, Kent, England

Civil parish: Lenham
Ecclesiastical parish: Lenham
Town: Frinsted
County/Island: Kent
Country: England

Street Address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Education:

Employment status: View image

Registration district: Hollingbourn
Sub-registration district: Lenham
ED, institution, or vessel: 4
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members: Name Age
James A Goodwin 40
Mary Goodwin 50
William J Neaves 11




Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 692; Folio 39; Page 6; GSU roll: 6095802.




Thelma

Thelma Report 9 Apr 2010 23:08

1891
Emma Neven Wm H,
Francis abt 1878 Wychling, Kent, England Daughter Doddington, Kent
1901
Ethel Neaves William H,
Frances E abt 1890 Lenham, Kent, England Daughter Eastling, Kent

Lorraine

Lorraine Report 9 Apr 2010 23:18

thanks for that info still cant find emma thou!

Kate

Kate Report 9 Apr 2010 23:20

Got them in 1901 -

William H Neaves aged 43, wife Frances E aged 40 with children Emily R (aged 14, b. Throwley), Ethel (aged 11, b. Lenham), Jesse (aged 9, b. Ospringe), May E (aged 7, b. Eastling), Albert G (aged 2, b. Eastling) and Charles B P (aged 10 months, b. Eastling).

The address is Mill Row, Eastling and the reference is RG13 Piece 806 Folio 21 Page 6.

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 9 Apr 2010 23:38

This is the family in 1891 census (Mis-transcribed) The writing is terrible:-

Name: Wm H Neven
Age: 35
Estimated birth year: abt 1856
Relation: Head
Spouse's name: Francis
Gender: Male
Where born: Sanoway, Kent, England
Civil parish: Doddington
Ecclesiastical parish: Doddington
Town: Doddington
County/Island: Kent
Country: England
Street Address:

Occupation:

Condition as to marriage:

Education:

Employment status:

View image
Registration district: Faversham
Sub-registration district: Teynham
ED, institution, or vessel: 5
Neighbors: View others on page
Household Members:
Name Age

Wm H Neven 35
Francis Neven 31
Emma Neven 13
Henry I Neven 9
Kate Neven 7
Emily K Neven 4
Ethel Neven 2

Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 715; Folio 46; Page 2; GSU roll: 6095825.

Kath. x

Lorraine

Lorraine Report 9 Apr 2010 23:39

Thanks Kate!L

Lorraine

Lorraine Report 9 Apr 2010 23:56

Hi Kath thank you. i have one for 1881 and there is a william on it. at 2 months.i suppose he could have died and then she had more children (francis) that is :)

Lorraine

Lorraine Report 10 Apr 2010 00:02

Kath i wonder if the Henry I was William I as on the 1881 c?

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 10 Apr 2010 00:04

No, William didn't die. Choccy found him staying with an aunt and uncle in the 1891 census.

Kath. x

Janice

Janice Report 10 Apr 2010 00:09

If William was born in Lenham, then that 'Sanoway' should be Sandway.

Janice

KathleenBell

KathleenBell Report 10 Apr 2010 00:11

I think your William I. Neeves is actually William J. Neeves. I think this is his birth:-

Name: William John Neeves
Year of Registration: 1881
Quarter of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar
District: Hollingbourne
County: Kent
Volume: 2a
Page: 734

and I think this is Henry from the 1891 census:-

Name: Henry James Neeves
Year of Registration: 1883
Quarter of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar
District: Hollingbourne
County: Kent
Volume: 2a
Page: 764

Kath. x

Lorraine

Lorraine Report 10 Apr 2010 00:26

Thanks yes i found that one .L :)

Janice

Janice Report 10 Apr 2010 00:31

Can't work out how James Alfred Goodwin and Mary are the aunt and uncle.
Mary's name at the marriage seems to be Tritton but this could be a 2nd marriage as she is 55 (age is 60 on the 1891 not 50). She dies in 1896.
Frances was Walters before she married so names aren't matching up.

Lorraine

Lorraine Report 10 Apr 2010 21:40

Ah... that would be why i had some much trouble matching it, i thought the name was waters thanks again for you help all of you your fab! L