General Chat
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
People who have the wrong info
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pat | Report | 7 Aug 2010 23:43 |
|
Thankyou very much for the replys. I did reply to the person in question as I did not give permission. I cannot see why my husbands family is of interest as an example. As it turns out I should still have a tree on ancestry from when I was a member and intend to rejoin some time. Thanks again. Pat |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 7 Aug 2010 12:28 |
|
Hi Elizabeth. |
|||
|
Elizabeth2469049 | Report | 7 Aug 2010 11:26 |
|
Pat - I think I do feel that if I have been given permission to use another person's tree on GR then the information is mine to use and I would add it to any other tree like Ancestry that I have - in fact I'm pretty sure I have done so, though I would always give the source of information as "X's tree on GR" or whatever. And I certainly wouldn't be surprised if information I have given on GR is used in someone's Ancestry tree. It is of course infuriating when they copy it wrong! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
+++DetEcTive+++ | Report | 7 Aug 2010 09:44 |
|
In reply to Pat (23:28) you can only add new ancestors to the tree on Ancestry if you have been given 'Editor' rights. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Huia | Report | 7 Aug 2010 04:36 |
|
Some people with trees on Ancestry put them there and then after their initial burst of enthusiasm they no longer look at it. I tried to contact a lot of people (about 164) early this year, who have my sister married to a man born in 1723. I discovered many of the people had not visited their trees for over 6 months. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Susan | Report | 7 Aug 2010 01:06 |
|
You should contact the person, they will prob be glad you put them right. |
|||
|
Pat | Report | 6 Aug 2010 23:28 |
|
After I was sent a gedcom, I sent my tree in return and I was surprised to find a email from Ancestery (which I am not a member of now) inviting me to view his site and I found my tree on there. However can someone tell me if I now add more family to my tree will that appear on his site automatically? This happened some time ago and have not added anything since. I do not have a large tree only the basic and he has some wrong info as well. Pat |
|||
|
Gwyn in Kent | Report | 6 Aug 2010 23:25 |
|
I've just been adding corrections / information to some trees by Comments on Ancestry re. direct ancestors. One had the wrong parents, one had the wrong John dying...easily done before ages were shown on the index. |
|||
|
Elizabeth2469049 | Report | 6 Aug 2010 22:23 |
|
Place names - in Ancestry it frequently seems to happen that unless you specify the country it gives the American address by default of a town name. I have written to people on various occasions about this - some have acknowledged it and altered it, some not! Other mistakes - I have written to Ancestry about obvious misreadings in the censues and they do correct it - and there is a place for Comment on the trees where you see errors and disparities, including being able to comment on other people's trees - though I believe they are able to delete your comment if they don't like it! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 6 Aug 2010 19:13 |
|
I have recently had contact with someone in America who has my cousin´s grandmother in his tree as having married & died in America. |
|||
|
Anthony | Report | 20 Jul 2010 11:02 |
|
I have also found trees both on here and on Ancestry where they have the wrong person. One tree had the wrong father for me. I first thought that it was not worth the bother of contacting them, but I am so surprised at how easily people accept the first thing they find on the net as being correct. Other people then happily follow an incorrect entry; soon you find that there are several trees all with the wrong information. |
|||
|
Deanna | Report | 30 Jun 2010 17:41 |
|
I have a few mistakes in my tree. |
|||
|
Claire in Lincs | Report | 30 Jun 2010 15:28 |
|
You are all correct of course.. |
|||
|
Hilary | Report | 30 Jun 2010 13:21 |
|
I opened my tree on here to someone who had a link to my husbands side, he pinched my whole tree. He then went further & put info on Family search & the tree on Ancestry. Somehow he has got it all mixed up, I now have my Scottish ancestors as being born in Hunts. When I pointed it out he got shirty with me. It really annoys me to get the wrong info up as no-one else has my tree on Ancestry. No good anyone contacting him about it as I found out too late he was a name collector. His problem to sort it out if anyone contacts him. |
|||
|
Eddieisagrandad | Report | 30 Jun 2010 12:31 |
|
i noticed recently that a distant relative had hopelessly wrong info on their tree. I contacted them at GR and said I would send them a small gedcom file with the correct info and sources and another e-mail with photographs and copies of newspaper articles. I sent the latter some weeks ago and fully expected a brief thank you and a level of enthusiasm at having a famous ancestor that they obviously did n't know about. Thus far I've heard not a word and until I do they can go on their merry, absurdly incorrect way - I'll be buggered if I'm going to send the gedcom too. Unfortunately, meanwhile all those poor souls that make use of their hot matches and don't do their own research are also being misled. |
|||
|
wisechild | Report | 30 Jun 2010 12:24 |
|
I´ve found several trees on Ancestry with my ancestors included but can´t ever work out how they are related to the family in question. |
|||
|
~~~Secret Red ^^ Squirrel~~~ **007 1/2** | Report | 30 Jun 2010 09:42 |
|
actually there's three. No need to steam in anywhere, just say that you noticed that your tree has different info and would it be possible to compare sources to see which is the correct info. |
|||
|
Lindsey* | Report | 30 Jun 2010 09:33 |
|
There are 2 schools of thought about this. You can steam in and tell them it's all wrong and risk a shirty reply. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
~~~Secret Red ^^ Squirrel~~~ **007 1/2** | Report | 30 Jun 2010 09:24 |
|
Hi Claire :) |
|||
|
Claire in Lincs | Report | 30 Jun 2010 08:47 |
|
Iv just looked a tree on ANCESTRY that has my husbands 2 x great grandfather as the child of totally different parents,, Correct dob and grandparents but born to someone iv never heard of, I cant even fiind this person as part of the family on the census, |
|||