General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

submitting corrections to FreeBMD

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 13 Aug 2010 20:18

So, do I hold the record? ;) I might have already - I submit corrections all the time for things I notice when I'm doing searches for TTF threads - but I think this might send me over the top.

The other day, I got an email saying

Acceptance of a request for 107 corrections to FreeBMD entries


What??? I thought. How bored was I that night? I've sometimes got emails accepting two or three corrections I did at the same time, but 107? Who were those names? None I recognized!

Then I scrolled through, and saw that all of them were in volume 6d and had been transcribed as volume 6c. I think I must have noticed it when trying to match up a couple, when the spouse wasn't in the list. I see they've corrected a couple of names along the way.

Yup, all same place, same year and quarter, same volume. Maybe I mentioned that when I made the submission ... but probably not, because if you try to explain the problem you get your submission rejected (instead of getting snooty emails from Mr X the way I used to).

So if anybody had been unable to date to find the matching spouse for a marriage in Kings Norton in Q2 1920, it should be all fixed now. ;)

Rambling

Rambling Report 13 Aug 2010 20:29

hee hee I hope you got it right Janey ;) otherwise.....

lol runs >>>>>>

JaneyCanuck

JaneyCanuck Report 13 Aug 2010 20:42

Oh, Rose, you know FreeBMD -- scrupulous to a fault, them! I'll shift any blame to them. Truly, I'm sure I only submitted one correction, and they figured the rest out for themselves.


PP, indeed, I submit corrections constantly. I have had a long email correspondence with someone who found one of his ancestors only from a correction I made -- I have no idea why I lit on it, but a household was all shown under the surname of the wife/mother, whose children did have her surname, but to whom the HOH wasn't married, so it was his surname that had been disappeared. However I ran across it, I searched and searched and fixed it up. And as a result, one of his descendants found him.

So the person whose ancestor it was PMed me, and we got to chatting, and he took a shine to my Hill/Monck tribe and set about trying to find inlaws for me in return for my assistance at Ancestry. And because of my anal insistence that people never change email subject lines, so my Gmail keeps the messages all together, I now have a huge thread of chat called "E___ A___ Read this AFTER you have read the first one", that's really about everything but Ms. EA, with much discussion of Jack the Riper and recipes for shepherd's pie. ;)