General Chat

To each their own is my motto. OH often watches what I call c**p but so what. He probably thinks that of most things I enjoy but we suffer them together :-D :-D :-D

With, in the audience’s opinion, ‘a good’ film, you get caught up in the story. On subsequent viewings you have time to spot the inconsistencies. As long as they don’t spoil your enjoyment, carry on watching :-D

We’ve probably all noticed continuity errors on occasions. Does it matter in the great scheme of things? No. We might chuckle at the time then re-immerse ourselves in the experience. At least it shows, as in David’s case, that we’re being observant.

No problem about commenting on the flaws, David :-D :-D

..it's the self- declared film critic who's out of order!

I see someone is being their usual charming self :-|

I've a few favourite films I've seen many times and I suppose commenting on flaws in

them does demonstrate I've nothing better to do.But doesn't content of much of the

chat thread show I'm not the only one with that problem ? No disrespect intended.

Or maybe they truly do have nothing better to do!! in which case is it good to point that out....either way each to their own...hope you enjoyed the movie or at least picking holes in it David :-D

Strange - it got fairly good reviews.
But then, I suppose some like to watch a film, as a film, and not as a documentary.

You must surely have something better to do than watch this dreadful movie. It is full of goofs. You can find an answer to your question here:

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064110/goofs

Heil Schiklgruber

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2hS_LhslTw

Bridge at Remagen CH31 on now how did the German Major's phone call for urgent assistance be interrupted by the opposing US Captain who knew who he was speaking to ?

Robert Vaughan and George Seagal.