Find Living Relatives

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Gift subscriptions

Genes Reunited gift subscription

Do you know someone interested in discovering their family history?

You can now buy a gift subscription to Genes Reunited so they can research their family tree.

Buy gift or redeem gift


  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

desedents for Hannah Hairyes?

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date


Nicholas Report 18 Jan 2012 16:12

Hi everyone,I have come to a brick wall in my research again,Hannah was born1867inknaresbourgh,yorkshire/died 1927 in bramley,leeds she married stephen lawrence in 1887 who died in 1911. haanh,lived in new wortley,leeds in 1901/and armley,leeds in 1911.remarried a henry beanland (no information?)in 1918.jim lawrence is hannahs only son iI know of thus far hes living with hannah in 1911 aged 9 so born approx 1902.but it states born in leeds no actuall district so no knowledge of what happend to him I apoligize for my lack of allways any help would be gratefully recived,many thnaks


Nicholas Report 18 Jan 2012 17:34

Hi everyone , I dont know if Ive typed anything wrong,i havent receved any relpys for my request. im not computer literate so apaolgize for any mistakes.please help


brummiejan Report 18 Jan 2012 17:41

Have just been looking Nicholas, and like you I cannot see anything more as yet. There are a couple of people on here with hannah in their tree, have you tried contacting them? Use 'search trees' above.


brummiejan Report 18 Jan 2012 17:51

In view of the spelling of Jim's name as Lawrance in 1911, (and the same spelling for the marriage) I wondered about this death, but just a guess really:

Name: James N Lawrance
Birth: abt 1902
Death: Jun 1965 - Leeds, Yorkshire West Riding, England



brummiejan Report 18 Jan 2012 17:54

Might be worth considering:

Births Mar 1902 (>99%)
LAWRANCE Edward James Bramley 9b 374


Nicholas Report 18 Jan 2012 18:04

I did message a member on here,but they new the same as myself,many thanks from Nicholas. ps does the jim on 1911 cenucus have a middle name,?


brummiejan Report 18 Jan 2012 18:09

He is just Jim on the census.


Penny Report 18 Jan 2012 19:20

Its gone round...and round...and round...and round every single genealogy site there is!


Nicholas Report 18 Jan 2012 19:29

the members at geneolgists forum unfortunatley couldnt find any inffromation on jim after 1911 ,thats why im trying here what is wrong with that? only used the one site.theres not one shred of evidence of me using any other site for hanahs desnedents apart from geneoligists forum,now i feel victimised on here( just the one site i think youll find!! :-|


Penny Report 18 Jan 2012 19:31

They did try,
posted countles marriages for Jim's

Someone posted about 100 for James's

No one has a magic wand, no one knows which one is yours.


Penny Report 18 Jan 2012 19:32

How are you related to Hannah to know so little about her? are there no other avenues you can go down?


Nicholas Report 18 Jan 2012 19:39

im hannnahs great nephew. my family is huge so covering one member at a time just started hannah and im extremely upset that you would make out that ive been round round round round everysite,when thta is simply not true. as youll see on the geneoligists site they couldnt find apostive marriage/death or children for jim lawrenece only for me to come on here for help from theese kind hearated people only to be insulted by you,for no resaon what so ever.i may have to leave this site i didnt say they didnt try i said the members couldnt find anything for jim.they do a great job at genes too.deeply upset over this stress


jax Report 18 Jan 2012 19:51

I cannot see why you think that just because one website cant find the details...another will be able too?

Everyone is looking at the same records


Nicholas Report 18 Jan 2012 20:01

I appreciate that but the peole may have acess to different records and also different ideas of where to luck or how to luck as im not comupter literate at all! i dont have a paid ancetry account ! also i heard that sometimes have geneoligists on here. you people are great the mebers on here just dont know what to do abut jim lawrence now? please help?


Penny Report 18 Jan 2012 20:02

So you are the neph of one of hannahs brothers- yes? which brother?

No-one has any iodea WHAT to do about Jim Lawrance! Thats the problem!

We all have access to pretty much the same records, some are the same people who,like you , flit between sites.


Nicholas Report 18 Jan 2012 20:04

I apoligize penny i think you were making a joke and I took it the wrong way just frustrating not been able to find people but thats no exuse.many thanks fro nichoals


Penny Report 18 Jan 2012 20:09

Some people just have to remain a mystery


Nicholas Report 18 Jan 2012 20:10

I apoligize for that becuase i should have mentioned immediatley bout the other thread. i guess Jim lawrence is one person we will never find,well goodnite to you all and thanks for your time,good luckwith your research


jax Report 18 Jan 2012 20:21

You also started this thread which you should have stuck with, which you started 3 hours before you posted on the other site