Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Mary Ann Hopper 1840
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Kucinta | Report | 7 Oct 2012 17:18 |
Again, in 1901: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 7 Oct 2012 17:14 |
Too busy driving his cab probably - thank you so much |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 7 Oct 2012 17:12 |
FINALLY, John Thomas Moore and EMILY in 1911: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:36 |
Back to Elizabeth Jane/Jane Elizabeth the two potential marriages. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:27 |
SORRY - hadn't spotted it was Emma in the census not Emily. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:27 |
My John T says birth was Lambeth so is this correct ? |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:25 |
Census 1901 for John T. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:20 |
Is Emma and Emily interchangeable |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:17 |
Can't find John and Emma in 1901, this might be them in 1911 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:15 |
Fantastic you've been a great help |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:14 |
Charles Frederick Moore & Elizabeth Cottle in 1911: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:12 |
Just trying to identify which marriage of the two was most likely. Forenames were often reversed, and the witness at the Davies marriage is a match for Jane Elizabeth/Elizabeth Jane's brother. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:11 |
Could i ask for help please in locating 1901 with john t moore and Emily - cannot see them |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:07 |
i am related to the Hopper parentage not the Moore side |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:04 |
|
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:03 |
it would seem to be a match i guess |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 7 Oct 2012 16:00 |
HI, I posted the Newton marriage earlier in the thread, and John's occupation is given as a naturalist there. Is the occupation close enough? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 7 Oct 2012 15:55 |
I have a Jane Elizabeth married to Thomas Newton so either that is wrong or he died and she remarried...... |
|||
|
Kucinta | Report | 7 Oct 2012 15:50 |
Not sure about this one as names are reversed, but John Moore is an ostler which I believe is something to do with horses and one witness is John Thomas Moore |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mark | Report | 7 Oct 2012 15:48 |
Thank you Kucinta and Potty your help much appreciated |