Hasker Street, London.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: July 2007 Posts: 197 Send Message	Norfolkboy	Report	12 Jan 2013 22:20
Member Since: July 2007 Posts: 197 Send Message	I have found a relative on the 1871 Census living with his family on Hasker Street, parish of St. Luke, London. There are a lot of Families listed from all part's England there, Was this an institute of some kind ??
Member Since: July 2006 Posts: 20,091 Send Message	brummiejan	Report	12 Jan 2013 22:36
	Maybe you could give details so people can have a look at that census? Jan
	Researching: Myatt, Hanks, Eccleston, Powell, Clungunford, Birmingham
Member Since: July 2007 Posts: 197 Send Message	Norfolkboy	Report	12 Jan 2013 22:42
Member Since: July 2007 Posts: 197 Send Message	William W. Copland, 1843, Norfolk. Other name in household, Charley Copland.
Member Since: July 2004 Posts: 30,608 Send Message	GlitterBaby	Report	12 Jan 2013 22:47
	The house number has been cut off the image so not an institution Have you looked at the previous or next image ?
	Researching: Think the picture says it all.
Member Since: July 2006 Posts: 20,091 Send Message	brummiejan	Report	12 Jan 2013 22:54
	They are separate households I think. Jan
	Researching: Myatt, Hanks, Eccleston, Powell, Clungunford, Birmingham
Member Since: July 2007 Posts: 197 Send Message	Norfolkboy	Report	12 Jan 2013 22:55
Member Since: July 2007 Posts: 197 Send Message	I see what you mean GlitterBaby, I was going by the "View Household Record" where they have listed everybody in the street !! Thanks.
Member Since: April 2004 Posts: 2,456 Send Message	Chris in Sussex	Report	12 Jan 2013 22:58
	The enumerator hasn't numbered the street, maybe it wasn't at that time. Each house is ended by a double slash mark under the last named person in the house. For example under Louisa M Copland. Where the house has more than one 'family' then there is a single slash which seperates the different families. For example the Thorn household ends with Alice Thorn so there is a single slash and then in the same house are the Baugh household. After the Baughs is a double slash. The column headed 'inhabited' has a mark against each house and at the bottom the total number of houses shows 2. So not an institution, just an ordinary street. Hope that makes sense Chris
	Researching: Avatar: My paternal 2xGGrandmother Eliza Worwood nee Card (1828-1878).
Marked as Answered
Member Since: July 2007 Posts: 197 Send Message	Norfolkboy	Report	12 Jan 2013 23:00
Member Since: July 2007 Posts: 197 Send Message	That makes sense, Thanks everyone,
Member Since: July 2005 Posts: 1,386 Send Message	Stuart	Report	12 Jan 2013 23:02
Member Since: July 2005 Posts: 1,386 Send Message	By doing an address search - Lots of houses in Hasker Street First 2 schedule numbers are 0 then various others from 450 to 609 (not all of those inbetween) If you look at either of the 0 schedules then it looks to list every household in Hasker Street, but if you look at a "numbered" schedule then you get an individual household. As far as I can tell the numbers of the individual houses are not visible on the census sheet so have been transcribed as one abode after number 8 (schedule 476) Then someone else has come along and split the households according to the enumerators marks Does that make any sense? There would appear to be William, wife Ruth, son Charley, daughters Laura and Louisa as one household when you view the original

Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

Boards

Quick Search

Single word search

Tools

New Scottish Census

Do you have Scottish ancestors?

Icons