Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Single word search
As a way of saying thank you to our subscribers, we have launched Genes Extras. You'll find exclusive competitions and discounts on family history magazines, days out and much more.
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Trying to find ancestor
|Profile||Posted by||Options||Post Date|
|Lynne||Report||12 Nov 2002 16:07|
Eileen, for the census i suggest that you put alternative versions of the names in. For example, one of my family names is SHELDRAKE, and i know that they were around at the time of the 1881 census, but they dont show up. somehow, they got writen down as SHALDRAKE. Same as the 1901 census, family name BURNAGE, transcribed as BARNAGE (but the original record clearly shows BURNAGE) When you search for your family, put in as LITTLE information as possible... People are frequently recorded as being born somewhere else (my family lore says that although my grandfather SAID he was a cockney, he wasnt really, and that he was born 1901. I have his birth certiicate. He was a cockney, and born 1907). A tip for some of you guys, if you write your surname in capitals, it makes it a lot easier for people to search through the messages (and is the accepted format in family history searching) :o) Lynne