Genealogy Chat

Hi Margaret.........there is a submitted entry on IGI for a Mary Wood buried 1859...having been born c1800 at Glossop.........there are also several possibilities for a re-marriage..too many to decide....what was her maiden name??

Derek.

Hi Derek

Just a reminder for when you next go to Matlock. I'm looking for the death of Mary Wood, possibly 1851 to 1861 (as she is on the 1851 census but not there in 1861), in Glossop. Wife or Widow of Joseph Wood. Mary born 8 June 1805, and baptised at All Saints C of E Church, Glossop, known as The Parish Church. She could, of course have remarried after the death of Joseph, which I have not found.

Thanks

Margaret

Night Derek, sleep well

Right wing rubbish..just like to N.O.W.........I'm a Guardian man myself..but don't hold it against me!.......and I'm only sticking around for your sake..so i'm glad to sign off for the night.

derek.

Thank you for that Derek. Getting towards falling asleep over the keyboard so don't be surprised if I suddenly disappear it is nothing personal :-D If I do I will look in again tomorrow incase you have found anything else oh brilliant one. I have not got a copy of the News of the world will a Daily Mail do ??

Have just edited my previous messagee..but you answered too quick..taje another look. xx

Thanks Derek. I wait with baited breath

Ok..answer to your question..getting into very rarified atmiosphere her...like the stuff that comes out of a boiling kettle............GEORGE ALLCOCK what wos married to ROSA..and who produced your Frederick 1866........was one of several children...baptised Boylestone..of RICHARD ALLCOCK and ELIZABETH LEESON married Boylestone 12.04.1824..and had loads of children thereafter...............reason for the boiling kettle is that he married..apparently...as RICHARD ALCOCK.........had several children baptised with that name,,which then becomes ALLCOCK......
with the tendency to mistranscribe..or indeed to mis record......this may explain why you have what appears to be information that conflicts with what \i have found for you.......like for instance why \i cannot find Frederick Allcock on the Census between 1871 and 1901...............more later xEDIT 23.40.........I am so overcome with my brilliance that I'm going to have to go have a rub-down with a wet News of the World!!!

FREDERICK ALLCOCK married ADA ROACH at Burton on Trent..fourth quarter 1900...........told you she caame from Coton in the Elms!!.....bear in mine this is civil registration not actual wedding........will try and find that out for your before I swoon unconscious.......

on 1881 it gets better take a look, John 1886 appears and Albert 1878 too

Ah your favorite folk those Meashams LOL. ;-). I have that census too a bit confusing or what ?

I have George and Rosa as parents in the PR's..George and Mary Ann on the 1871 Census!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.............and in the 1901 census Frederick is married to Ada then years his junior..who came from Coton in the elms Staffs.............not that far from the dreaded \measham country!!!!!!!!!!!!

I think you may well be right Derek. Was the father of George, Richard and Mother Elizabeth Leeson please

Eyup Gooner..........think you could be wrong.......the two siblings I have found are much closer to the DOB of our Fred.........and from |Kirk langley PR's.which are not only bulletproof,but pretty reliable!!

Thank you Derek, I will watch with interest. :-). Hmm just looked into my tree and I have his mother as Mary Jane Leyland. and 2 siblings John 1873 and Albert 1877

Hi LG......it did not happens at either Kirk |Langley or at Boylestone..at least not before 1910...........i have both Pr's

FREDERICJ ALLCOCK did however come from Kirk Langley'baptised there 06.03.1866............he was one of three children of George and Rosa........the other two being Henry 05.04.1863 and Elizabeth 30.05.1864.....still looking for further info........you know me!!

Derek.

Hello Derek, I am looking for the surname of a bride please. I have Frederick Allcock born 1866 Kirk Langley marrying Ada ??? about 1900. Kirk Langley ? or Boylestone.

Thank you.

Hi Derek

I've found some more info re. my Mary Hallam born c1865 and wonder if you would be so kind as to do another couple of lookup for me please?

Death: John Hallam 1884 Jul-Sep Shardlow - should be aged about 43

Marriage: John Hallam to Ann Rollans or Rollins 1879 Oct-Dec Shardlow

Many thanks in advance :-)

Mary

:-D

hello derek
if you are feeling bored i would wellcome some help on this branch of my purdy family although i thin they have strayed a bit from derbyshire

william purdy born 1848 eastwood notts married three times the devel

1 elizabeth pynegar born 184 eastwood married 6-6-1863 independant chapel heanor parents john pynegar-hannah rawson elizabeth died 1875 basford

2 mary hallem born 1847 eastwood married june 1875 basford

3 margerat allcock whom i have no info


thanks sally w :-) <3

hello derek
if you are feeling bored i would wellcome some help on this branch of my purdy family although i thin they have strayed a bit from derbyshire

william purdy born 1848 eastwood notts married three times the devel

1 elizabeth pynegar born 184 eastwood married 6-6-1863 independant chapel heanor parents john pynegar-hannah rawson elizabeth died 1875 basford

2 mary hallem born 1847 eastwood married june 1875 basford

3 margerat allcock whom i have no info


thanks sally w :-) <3

Hi Derek

Apologies for not replying sooner, I had some work to get finished before tomorrow. :-((

Thank you for looking for me. I believe that Mary Hallam on the 1871 census could well be the right one, hence my searching for a birth for her, as it's the only one I can find with the correct father's occupation...........but.........according to her marriage cert in 1887 she gives her father as deceased, and I'm pretty sure that particular John Hallam is still alive in 1891, although his occupation has changed by that time. :-((

I might be clutching at straws here........but now I'm wondering if the info on the marriage cert is incorrect? Her husband's father was deceased but isn't noted as such on the cert, her's is though, I wonder if it's a mistake and it should be the other way round???

Anything you can find for me would be very much appreciated Derek, thank you. :-D

Mary

Edit to add: Derek, would you know which registration district Ockbrook would have come under circa 1865? There are some Mary Hallam births in the BMD indexes but I really don't have a clue as to which one might be in the right area. Thanks. :-D