Genealogy Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Query on GRO Birth Search

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Potty

Potty Report 6 Nov 2016 11:29

I too have found some with no MMN. The ones I have found so far have all been illegitimate births.

Edit: Have now found some with no MMN that I am pretty sure were not illegitimate.

I have also found that searching after 1911, the full child's name is given, not just the first plus initials. Also, for searching in that period, using initials does not work. You have to use the first name and then search through the pages brought up. If a birth has already been found (eg on freebmd), use the first name plus the Reg district.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 5 Nov 2016 23:22

The snag that I have found is that Deaths seem unable to distinguish between months and years ........ the new images only show the age by a number


so a baby who dies at 6 months old (shown on the certificate) and a child who dies at age 6 years will both show on the new image as 6 ...................

it becomes important when finding children born and died between censuses.


Plus ................ mmn is NOT shown on every image of a birth registration.

I found a lot of mine without mmn, so was still unsure of whether I had the correct children, especially in families that all used the same forenames, over and over again.

+++DetEcTive+++

+++DetEcTive+++ Report 5 Nov 2016 14:07

Done!

Potty

Potty Report 5 Nov 2016 13:14

That's very interesting, Det. I wonder if they will continue the trial.

Might be useful to post that info on AustinQ's thread re the GRO Indexes - the more people who buy the PDFs may encourage them to continue.

+++DetEcTive+++

+++DetEcTive+++ Report 5 Nov 2016 13:10

True :-D

According to Lost Cousins newsletter, there will be the option to buy digitalised copies for £6 from 9 Nov. Only a limited number of purchases will be available within the 3 week trial period.
.......
The trial will last for only 3 weeks, but may close earlier (only 45,000 PDFs will be made available at this price). My guess is that those 45,000 PDFs will be sold very, very quickly -
Births: 1837 to 1934
Deaths: 1837 to 1957

http://lostcousins.com/newsletters2/specialnov16news.htm#PDFtrial
.......

Potty

Potty Report 5 Nov 2016 12:56

Yes, possible, Det. Isn't annoying when new info brings up more queries instead of answering the original one?

+++DetEcTive+++

+++DetEcTive+++ Report 5 Nov 2016 12:50

Guessing - they went back to add in the name Bowers?

Potty

Potty Report 5 Nov 2016 12:37

I was hoping that the addition of MMN to the GRO Index would help to sort out these two:

Births Jun 1867
Lamport William Farnham 2a 93
Lamport William Farnham 2a 93

but this is what the GRO has:

Name:Mother's Maiden Surname:

LAMPORT, WILLIAM -
GRO Reference: 1867 J Quarter in FARNHAM Volume 02A Page 92 Occasional Copy: A
LAMPORT, WILLIAM BOWERS Order
GRO Reference: 1867 J Quarter in FARNHAM Volume 02A Page 93

The page Nos differ and has anyone any idea what "Occasional Copy:A" could mean?