General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Princess Diana

ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Jan.

Jan. Report 4 Dec 2012 17:59

After reading the happy news yesterday about William and Kate having a baby, I was reading a report in the Daily Mail. They had a article about Princess Diana suffering a miscarriage a year after giving birth to William, before she had Harry.
I hadn't known that - I don't recall it being publicised, unless I missed it? Does anyone else remember it being publicised?

I did a google search on it, and several articles came up that suggested it is true - though I do realise that you can't believe everything you read on the internet.

This is one from one of the links I found.

http://www.dianaforever.com/sonbirth.htm

After one year, press reported that a happy and blooming Diana had visited the Queen's gynaecologist, Dr. Pinker, twice within a few weeks. In September 1983, Buckingham Palace announced that the Princess was pregnant for a second time, but sadly, within a week, Diana suffered a miscarriage when on holiday at Balmoral, Scotland.

AnnCardiff

AnnCardiff Report 4 Dec 2012 18:51

never heard about that

Muffyxx

Muffyxx Report 4 Dec 2012 18:52

If she did have a miscarriage then I think it's foul of the press to have reported it...

It's an intensely emotional time and the last thing she would have needed were people prying and asking questions.

There's no excuse that it was in the public's best interests to know...because it wasn't. It was nobody's business but hers and the close family and friends who SHE would've wanted to know.

Jan.

Jan. Report 4 Dec 2012 19:21

I agree with everything you say Muffy, but from what the above statement says, Buckingham Palace announced the pregnancy to the public, and that she sadly miscarriaged not long after.

I've just never heard about it and don't recall any announcement about it from the Palace.

Muffyxx

Muffyxx Report 4 Dec 2012 19:30

I don't recall an official announcement of a new baby tbh either....but I have to confess to not being an avid follower of the news at that stage in my life so it's ever likely it passed me by too ! :-D