General Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: November 2002 Posts: 0 Send Message	Peter	Report	8 Oct 2004 21:10
Member Since: November 2002 Posts: 0 Send Message	This may be a controversial thread, but its possible in the future that will soon be uploading their ludicrously large gedcoms here (4000+ names). I will stick my neck out here by saying that several of these trees are very poorly researched and will throw an ocean of red herrings into the family history pool. Mine is too large for this site (1700 names) and will be heavily pruned. There are some that are so desperate for historical , royal or even biblical roots that real research appears unimportant. Is there scope for a seperate American site?

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.