Genealogy Chat

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Page 2 + 1 of 3

Profile	Posted by	Options	Post Date
Member Since: December 2003 Posts: 94 Send Message	Ian	Report	30 Nov 2019 13:31
Member Since: December 2003 Posts: 94 Send Message	I know the year differs from the 1939 census by one ( I think it is 1909) but what are the odds of both of them coming up with 6th February. I like the idea that Grace may have been registered at both addresses as she still appears at her old address and with her previous married name. Why else would she be not allowed to vote in Woolwich as she would have been well over the voting age in the 1950's.

All site material is owned by Findmypast Limited and should not be used without prior permission.

Any views expressed in message boards and members notes represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the opinions of Findmypast Limited.