General Chat

So here's the timetable of events then:

17.01 David posts apology

17.09 Gill emails Dizzi

17.21 Dizzi posts Gill's message to David

Now unless Uggers is psychic, and I dont think he is, he wouldnt have a scoobie that Gill had sent an acceptance via Dizzi, would he LWH.

So how is goodness name could he "apologise via Dizzi" (which is what I took your response to mean) BEFORE he knew of her involvement?

Jac Today at 19:08 Request review
Yes I understand that SRS - but why on earth would anyone think that David should message Dizzi to get an apology to Gill?

He just did the gentlemanly thing and posted on here, so that she (Gill) could see it and I'm sure had no knowledge that Gill had sent a message via Dizzi until well after his original posting.



Sorry Jac, I hadn't realised the point you were making, I thought you meant that Gill couldn't see the thread. Sorry. Yes of course, you're perfectly right. Besides how would Uggers know who to contact to contact Gill? Besides if he made a public accusation, I can't see the problem with a public apology. Now if he was wanting to debate a contentious issue, I could see why he may want to keep it off the boards, but an apology?

If someone wants to apologise in private, that is a whole different matter.

I HAVE NOT BEEN OUT ALL DAY

I WENT FRIDAY

I CAME BACK TODAY

AND YES I HAD A LOVELY TIME

THANK YOU FOR ASKING

SETTING UP POSSIBLE VENTURES

naff all Lynda lol

5:09 PM



EMAILTIMED

AND NO I DIDNT LOOK STRAIGHT AWAY

HAD A CAR TO UNPACK
FRIENDS CARBOOT TO RUMMAGE THROUGH
AND KISS MY GRANDKIDS

Yes I understand that SRS - but why on earth would anyone think that David should message Dizzi to get an apology to Gill?

He just did the gentlemanly thing and posted on here, so that she (Gill) could see it and I'm sure had no knowledge that Gill had sent a message via Dizzi until well after his original posting.

Uggs has made a public apology to someone that he feels he publicly wronged.

Good
Gill has accepted that apology publicy via Dizzi
Good

and all there is to say is Well done Uggs for being a gent and well done Gill for accepting.
Isn't it nice when that happens and all what keeps the thread up is the well dones

you don't have to be a member to read the boards which is a bit scary

Well, if you look back LWH you will see that Dizzi said she had been out and only read Gill's message on her return - about half way down this thread I think! a long time after David had posted his apology to Gill.

So how on earth could David know that Gill had messaged Dizzi?

Sorted, Jac :-)

Well forgive me if I am wrong here.........but how could Uggs offer an apology to someone "off the boards" when the person who was to received the apology is no longer a member?

Uggs had no option other than to place the apology on the boards, knowing fine and well that Gill would be watching.

LWH Today at 18:11 Request review
Perhaps it would have been better done off the board then

Add


So might your thread LWH. What did you expect to achieve with that? At least this was an apology, not an order for others to do so.

Hahaha !

*Sticks broom up me arris and goes to sweep the boards en route to other threads*


PMSL !

pmsl Uggs - I'm on the wrong thread! - lol lol lol

But.........they are all bleeding tedious, aint they? )))))

I want to apologise for calling Uggers cute and fluff.....oh ok then. Bye >>>>>>>>;)

True enough Gwen - everyone else can clear off and do their apologising or not apologising on their own threads lol

THIS IS BETWEEN UGGERS AND GILL

APPOLOGIES HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED

I haven't asked you to, Hoff:)

no need for me to apologise.

See........that's funny Mildred - cos LWH refers to Boatie as "he" - now where did you get the impression Boatie was a "she"?

Anyway, I didnt think Boatie was Gill/Skwirrel whoever and I dont need to apologise but if it keeps the peace, then I will.