General Chat

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Birth Record

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

patchem

patchem Report 3 Aug 2014 20:53

I thought that on Sharon's birth certificate, which she has in her possession, her Mother is given as Phyllis Hodgson nee Saw, and Father as David Smith, but on the records it is only showing as Smith/Smith, so a mistake on the part of the GRO?

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 3 Aug 2014 21:03

patchem ...............


could be.


It is what is showing on all the records.


Maybe Sharon should contact the Records Office, and see if they will tell her what those records say?

 Sue In Yorkshire.

Sue In Yorkshire. Report 3 Aug 2014 21:59

Her mother could have also thought so much about registering Sharon in Smith she said Smith as her maiden name.

Don't forget back then they asked if the person was married to the father.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 3 Aug 2014 22:12

Sue ...


i also wondered if that was one explanation .....................


but you didn't have to show "proof" of marriage ...... eg, marriage certificate

 Sue In Yorkshire.

Sue In Yorkshire. Report 3 Aug 2014 22:20

Personally I think that is the only explanation.

I know a person didn't have to show marriage cert but to get herself (mother)out of a tight hole she had maybe dropped herself in she had to tell a little white lie.

Sharon shouldn't be worrying over the surname she was registered in as she is a lovely caring,thoughtful person.. :-D :-) :-D <3 <3 <3 for Sharon.

InspectorGreenPen

InspectorGreenPen Report 4 Aug 2014 16:33

Do we know what date we are talking about? There is the assumption here the surname does not actually appear on a Birth Certificate.

Whilst this used to be the case, since 1969 (I think this was the year it changed - it could have been later, though) the surname does appear, and to make things even more complicated it can be whatever name the mother chooses - it does not even have to be that of the father or mother!

Don't forget too that the GRO Index is just that. An index. Whilst it appears to be current practice to index all possible combinations of names if there is any ambiguity, this is not guaranteed. Then of course what you search on line is yet another index of the GRO index, in itself subject to further inconsistencies.

SylviaInCanada

SylviaInCanada Report 4 Aug 2014 18:20

IGP ...............


yes we do know the date ................. as would you if you had followed what Sharon said.


FYI ....................... it is prior to 1965

Sharon

Sharon Report 8 Aug 2014 13:06

That could be it x