Find Living Relatives

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

Elizabeth Mary Climo b.1955

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Penny

Penny Report 6 Apr 2012 07:26

So which is the one that the poster seeks?

Elizabeth M or Elizabeth A?

Stephen

Stephen Report 6 Apr 2012 10:10

Hi, it is ELIZABETH M CLIMO we are searching for, we have been led to believe the d.o.b was 1952, but it is always possible that this is wrong.
(edit...'52 was wrong, it apears to 1955 registerd in 1956)

Just to clarify: Beryl Arfield was adopted and took the name of Climo, at the time Beryl gave birth to Elizabeth, Beryl's surname was Climo.

Penny

Penny Report 6 Apr 2012 12:19

must be the 1956 one then. registered first qtr so born xmas eve 1955 is quite possible

ErikaH

ErikaH Report 6 Apr 2012 13:53

Unless this person was adopted, the birth date etc should NOT be on this board

And those you posted, Kellie, should definitely not be on here.

The 1952 birth info is an invasion of the lady's privacy.

Stephen

Stephen Report 6 Apr 2012 15:49

Elizabeth Mary Climo WAS adopted, as far as I know any information posted here regarding birthdates is from publicly available index records . The "1952 birth info" applies to Elizabeth Mary Climo who as previously stated more than once WAS adopted. I hope this clarifies things for you Reggie !!!!!!!

(Edit - birth date apears to be 1955 after more information has become available)

Joy

Joy Report 6 Apr 2012 17:08

Perhaps, as this site is totally public, Stephen, it could be tactful to remove the exact date of birth and change it to just the year? Just a gentle, polite suggestion.

Stephen

Stephen Report 6 Apr 2012 18:02

Well....it seems even although Elizabeth was adopted posting the birhdate continues to cause concern, so to allay any fears I have edited this to just leave the birth year ! I hope that will keep everyone happy !

Penny

Penny Report 6 Apr 2012 19:21

Crazy! She was given for adoption, could be called Anasatia Philomena Diddlewiddle -twiddlewiddle now, and that is if she hasn't married.

What difference did the birthdate make? Seriuosly, can someone explain?

Penny

Penny Report 7 Apr 2012 18:42

nudge to join near other thread

jax

jax Report 7 Apr 2012 21:23

So the one born in 1952 is nothing to do with you? plus it was no where near christmas time anyway so really the date of birth that was mentioned meant nothing as the year is obviously wrong

Penny

Penny Report 7 Apr 2012 21:40

So, to tied your two threads together, how are Beryl and Hilda related? or aren't they?

Stephen

Stephen Report 7 Apr 2012 22:46

Jax....the 1952 birth date was my wifes half sisters believed date of birth, however there are no living relatives who could confirm this, but it now seems that the birth date could have been 1955(registerd 1956). This was a birth to an unmarried mother who was secreted in an establishment in Cornwall called Rosemundy House, these things were not talked about and remained hidden for many years, so as you will understand details are sparse !!!

Hi Penny, Hilda was Beryl's aunt, ( her mothers sister ) . I will PM you.

Cheers
Steve

jax

jax Report 7 Apr 2012 23:35

Yes I know that was the date of birth you thought was hers.....but it obviously was not. The only part that was possibly correct was the day and month.

You have stated to Reggie the 1952 birth info that was posted by Kellie relates to someone who was adopted.....No it was'nt, that is why Reggie asked her to remove it

Sean

Sean Report 8 Apr 2012 01:46

hi stephen
if elizabeth climo was adopted she would have a new name now might not know the one she was born under
regards mandy

Sad_Mushroom

Sad_Mushroom Report 8 Apr 2012 06:31

RR me for a birth in 1952 but keep checking and following a birth in 1956??

How do you know the lady born in 1956 isn't still alive??
I get RR'd for mentioning someone in 1952??


Penny

Penny Report 8 Apr 2012 07:14

Kellie - She quite possibly is, but was given for adoption, so the name means sweet fanny adams to anyone!

If all this is delete by Genes, I shall be quite cross. its unnessary

Stephen

Stephen Report 8 Apr 2012 09:58

Jax .... if the 1952 date was wong for the name given then the name and date dont exist as as one entity....there will be no such person....so I cant see the problem !

EDITED section of text deleted .... sorry for any concerns this thread seems to have raised !
Many thanks to all who have tied to help !

Kind regards
Steve

jax

jax Report 8 Apr 2012 13:59

I dont know why you are having a go at me Stephen, I was only agreeing the birth details for 1952 posted by Kellie should be removed, but someone rr'd it anyway.

I was also agreeing as the birthdate and year did not match it did'nt really matter...maybe it did not come accross that way??

Edit- Thanks for your pm Stephen, confusion now cleared up

Stephen

Stephen Report 8 Apr 2012 14:14

Thanks Jax, it was not my intention to "have a go" at you....sorry if I misunderstood you., I have pm'd you.
Best wishes
Steve

Stephen

Stephen Report 16 Apr 2012 14:56

Quick update..we now have a birth certificate confirming the date of birth which was indeed 1955...the search continues :)

Thanks to all who have tried to help ! :)
Steve