Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Horatio Charles Skinner
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Katie | Report | 9 Dec 2010 08:06 |
|
The details for Lily look right. They didn't give her a very aspirational job in 1911, poor girl! |
|||
|
jax | Report | 9 Dec 2010 00:01 |
|
Unless this is Arthur? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Dec 2010 23:54 |
|
Thats why I posted those deaths which could possably be them? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
LadyKira | Report | 8 Dec 2010 23:46 |
|
Ok Jax |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Dec 2010 18:12 |
|
There is nine LK think you need to go to spec savers lol |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
LadyKira | Report | 8 Dec 2010 18:01 |
|
Just a thought |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Dec 2010 18:00 |
|
I Know that... and as West Ham came under Essex too it is not included in the London Baptisms |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Dec 2010 17:45 |
|
Walthamstow is'nt covered in the London Baptisms as I have found with my own family. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Katie | Report | 8 Dec 2010 11:49 |
|
Thanks for helping me to start unravelling all of this! I am still struggling with Alfred. |
|||
|
jax | Report | 8 Dec 2010 02:02 |
|
No I think that means Essex I was born in Walthamstow which was Essex in those days LK |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
LadyKira | Report | 8 Dec 2010 01:56 |
|
Getting an error message when I try to look at the image |
|||
|
jax | Report | 7 Dec 2010 23:50 |
|
?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 7 Dec 2010 23:37 |
|
1891? |
|||
|
jax | Report | 7 Dec 2010 23:34 |
|
Well there are two Arthurs MC and the elder Arthur and lily are not on the 1901 either |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Katie | Report | 7 Dec 2010 23:33 |
|
As you say jax very strange, I'll have to sort out who is alive and who is dead! They all seem to have "occupations"... It does look like him though. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 7 Dec 2010 23:29 |
|
Odd Jax, I wonder if they meant 5 still at home? There are occupations/scholar status given , which there surely wouldn't be if they really had died. |
|||
|
jax | Report | 7 Dec 2010 23:23 |
|
Very strange on the 1911 they had 9 children but 4 had died but they still included them it seems. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 7 Dec 2010 23:19 |
|
1901 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 7 Dec 2010 23:15 |
|
1911 census - household transcription |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Mike * | Report | 7 Dec 2010 23:14 |
|
Best way is to buy the certificate. |
|||