Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Jane Crook (Ingram)
| Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Marked as Answered |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 20 May 2012 18:05 |
|
I'm looking for info on Jane |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 20 May 2012 18:10 |
|
so what info are you looking for ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 20 May 2012 18:12 |
|
Was she only 13 when she married?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
LondonBelle | Report | 20 May 2012 18:15 |
|
Are their birth years correct? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 20 May 2012 18:18 |
|
? |
|||
|
Andrew | Report | 20 May 2012 18:19 |
|
Born 1897 would make her just 13 at marriage. Could this be her born 1889?? |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 20 May 2012 18:21 |
|
1911?? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 20 May 2012 18:22 |
|
not the right 1911 census couple |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 20 May 2012 18:25 |
|
Peter had Jane, 1887, in his tree. |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 22 May 2012 18:42 |
|
My apologies, yes birth date is 10 years out. |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 22 May 2012 19:03 |
|
Have you tried an address search on the 1911 if they appear to be at the same area when Robert died |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MaureeninNY | Report | 22 May 2012 19:44 |
|
I may have lost the plot! Just putting this here because of the address: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 22 May 2012 19:53 |
|
Maybe she didn't like being married so just went back to her mum and pretended it never happened? Maybe it was annulled? |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 22 May 2012 20:29 |
|
Bridget Ingram was a widow who seemed to keep having babies: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 22 May 2012 20:49 |
|
Could be Roberts records: |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 22 May 2012 23:02 |
|
Seen that ad - should have gone to spec savers ? |
|||
|
MaureeninNY | Report | 23 May 2012 02:22 |
|
I think we may all need to go to spec savers. There are actually 2 births listed on his army records,I think-one for Robert and one for Henry. I really can't be sure of the dates. |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 23 May 2012 17:16 |
|
Given that Robert's wife is named as Mary Jane on his army record, could this be her death? |
|||
|
Peter | Report | 24 May 2012 01:24 |
|
All |
|||
Marked as Answered